Here the People Rule, and Their Will Is the Supreme Law

QUOTES ON LIBERTY AND JUSTICE, TRUTH AND DUTY:

 

“Freedom and Liberty cannot exist without Individual Responsibility. Failure to exercise Individual Responsibility forfeits your right to self-governance and delivers it to Government which, through force, will set the parameters of your life.”

-Brian Wilson, radio personality

 

“People who pride themselves on their “complexity” and deride others for being “simplistic” should realize that the truth is often not very complicated. What gets complex is evading the truth.” Barbarians inside the Gates and Other Controversial Essays 

-Thomas Sowell   

 

“Nowhere at present is there such a measureless loathing of their country by educated people as in America.” First Things, Last Things

-Eric Hoffer

 

“I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.”

-Frederick Douglass

 

“While the unitary state of the French Revolution would become the dominant political fashion of Europe, a quite different model emerged from the American Revolution. Whereas the French Revolution was a struggle by the bourgeoisie to control and augment the power of the center, the American Revolution was really a war of secession by the periphery from the center. The French model was designed to secure liberty by centralization; the American to secure liberty by decentralization. Very early, Madison crafted the doctrine of state interposition, and Jefferson the doctrine of state nullification. Calhoun developed these ideas into America’s first systematic political philosophy, A Disquisition on Government. Lord Acton, who was greatly concerned with the problem of how to limit the centralization of power in a modern state, included the Disquisition in his list of the 100 most important books ever written.”

Donald W. Livingston

 

“Sometimes faith is the only friend you got to get your head above the water. Freedom is still the only thing that can save our sons and daughters… I sit and hope for inspiration while the world misunderstands…”

-Matt Prater

 

“Our heroes are over there where the white crosses are. We’re survivors over here. None of us are heroes. I don’t think you’ll talk to a man who say we are. You figure a hero is someone who does above and beyond the call of duty, and when you give your life that’s as above and beyond as you can get.” Marcus Brotherton, We Who Are Alive and Remain: Untold Stories from the Band of Brothers

-Earl McClung

 

“The ultimate aim of government is not to rule, or restrain, by fear, nor to exact obedience, but contrariwise, to free every man from fear, that he may live in all possible security; in other words, to strengthen his natural right to exist and work without injury to himself or others.

No, the object of government is not to change men from rational beings into beasts or puppets, but to enable them to develop their minds and bodies in security, and to employ their reason unshackled; neither showing hatred, anger, or deceit, nor watched with the eyes of jealousy and injustice. In fact, the true aim of government is liberty.” Theological-Political Treatise (1670), Ch. 20, That In a Free State Every Man May Think What He Likes, and Say What He Thinks

-Baruch Spinoza

 

“Unlike any other nation, here the people rule, and their will is the supreme law. It is sometimes sneeringly said by those who do not like free government, that here we count heads. True, heads are counted, but brains also . . .”

-William McKinley

 

“What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” Letter to William Smith, November 13, 1787

-Thomas Jefferson

 

“The compelling issue to both conservatives and liberals is not whether it is legitimate for government to confiscate one’s property to give to another, the debate is over the disposition of the pillage.”

-Walter Williams

 

“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”

-Thomas Paine

 

“I think we have to understand that when tolerance becomes a one-way street, it will lead to cultural suicide.”

-Allen West

 

“Hold them heads up! Look fierce! Look mean! Look like the devil Look like me!”

-Sol Street

 

“The houses of early Texans were small, but their hearts were large enough to cover all deficiencies. No candidate for hospitality was ever turned away.”

-Noah Smithwick, pioneer Texas settler, on traveling through Texas in the early days of the state

 

“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.” American Communications Assn v. Douds, 1950

-Robert H. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court Justice

 

“We defend the same principles that fired the hearts of our ancestors in the revolutionary struggle.”

-Soldier

 

“You know, doing what is right is easy. The problem is knowing what is right.”

-Lyndon B. Johnson

 

“Freedom is the emancipation from the arbitrary rule of other men.”

-Mortimer Adler

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas business law attorneys in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

 

Demand For Appraisal in Texas Homeowner’s Insurance Policy Lawsuit–Ft Worth, Texas Insurance Defense Attorneys

REVERSE and REMAND; Opinion issued July 11, 2007

In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
……………………….
No. 05-06-00100-CV
……………………….
LINDA RICHARDSON, Appellant
V.
ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD’S, Appellee
…………………………………………………….
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 02-01779-H
…………………………………………………….
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and Lagarde
Opinion By Justice Lagarde   See Footnote 1

Appellant Linda Richardson sued Allstate Texas Lloyd’s (Allstate), seeking to overturn an appraisal award entered on her insurance claim for sewer damage to her home. After originally denying Allstate’s successive motions for summary judgment, upon reconsideration, the trial court granted Allstate’s second motion and dismissed Richardson’s claims with prejudice.
Richardson appeals the summary judgment order and the trial court’s denial of her motion to designate experts. For reasons that follow, we conclude the summary judgment was improperly granted and we remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings. Because all dispositive issues are settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(a), 47.4.

Factual and Procedural Background
In December 2001, “a catastrophic pressurized infusion of raw sewage spewed through every plumbing opening” in Richardson’s home in Lancaster, Texas. Richardson’s home was insured by Allstate. Immediately after her home was flooded with sewage, Richardson contacted Allstate to make a claim under her insurance policy. Shortly thereafter, a dispute arose between Richardson and Allstate concerning the amount of Richardson’s insured loss. Accordingly, Allstate sent Richardson a written notice informing her that Allstate was invoking the appraisal provision of her insurance policy. The terms of that provision read, in pertinent part, as follows:

Appraisal. If you and we fail to agree on the actual cash value, amount of loss, or cost of repair or replacement, either can make a written demand for appraisal. Each will then select a competent, independent appraiser and notify the other of the appraiser’s identity within 20 days of receipt of the written demand. The two appraisers will choose an umpire. If they cannot agree upon an umpire within 15 days, you or we may request that the choice be made by a judge of a district court of a judicial district where the loss occurred. The two appraisers will than [sic] set the amount of loss, stating separately the actual cash value and loss to each item.
. . .

If the appraisers fail to agree, they will submit their differences to the umpire. An itemized decision agreed to by any two of these three and filed with us will set the amount of such loss. Such award shall be binding on you and us.

Allstate selected Jim Greenhaw as its independent appraiser. Richardson selected C.R. Johnson as her independent appraiser. The parties then agreed to use Sally Montgomery as the umpire, and she was appointed by the trial court in March 2002. On March 25, 2002, Johnson and Greenhaw signed their names on a blank form “Appraisal Award.” The top of that one-page form contains general information about the claim, including the names of the parties, the appraisers, and the umpire. The appraiser’s signatures are in the middle of the page beneath that general information. Directly underneath the appraisers’ signatures on the form award is a chart with three columns. The first column is titled “ITEM,” and the phrase “to be determined by hygienist” is hand- written beneath that title on the first numbered line. The next two columns, titled “LOSS REPLACEMENT COST” and “LOSS ACTUAL CASH VALUE,” are blank.
According to the record, after they signed the blank form, Greenhaw and Johnson each conferred separately with the umpire during the next few months. It appears, however, that neither appraiser prepared an itemized list of the cash value and loss to each item in Richardson’s house. According to Richardson, sometime prior to June 21, 2002, Johnson sent Montgomery a written estimate totaling approximately $141,000. The written estimate itself is not in the record. On June 21, 2002, Montgomery met with Greenhaw at Greenhaw’s office. During that meeting, Montgomery or Greenhaw wrote “$39,650.75” on the form appraisal award under the column “LOSS REPLACEMENT COST,” next to the phrase “to be determined by hygienist” previously written on the form award. Montgomery and Greenhaw then dated the award June 21, 2002 and both signed it. There is no evidence in the record that Montgomery or Greenhaw discussed this award with Johnson either before or after it was entered.
On July 16, 2002, Allstate sent Richardson a check for $27,813.95, the net amount of the award after deducting the amounts already paid to Richardson and half of the umpire’s fee. The next day, Johnson and Richardson wrote to the trial court complaining about the impropriety of the appraisal award and requested a meeting with the trial judge. There is no evidence in the record about whether such meeting occurred. On October 2, 2002, Richardson cashed Allstate’s check.         Thereafter, Richardson filed a petition seeking to set aside the appraisal award. In her suit against Allstate, Richardson asserted claims against Allstate for breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, negligence, negligence per se, and violation of articles 21.21 and 21.55 of the Texas Insurance Code.         Allstate moved for summary judgment twice. In its second motion for summary judgment, Allstate asserted it was entitled to summary judgment because (i) Richardson could not establish any grounds for setting aside the appraisal award, (ii) Richardson’s claims were barred by the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction, (iii) Richardson was estopped to assert a breach-of-contract claim, and (iv) Richardson’s extra-contractual claims were “unsupportable, as a matter of law.” The trial court denied Allstate’s first and second motions; but upon Allstate’s one-page motion to reconsider, the trial court granted Allstate’s second motion and dismissed Richardson’s claims with prejudice.
In this appeal, Richardson asserts five main points of error, each with multiple subpoints. In her first point, Richardson argues the summary judgment order is improper because the appraisal award is “void as a matter of law,” based, inter alia, on her contention that the appraisal procedure was not followed. In her second point, Richardson argues she is entitled to summary judgment on Allstate’s affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction. In her third issue, Richardson argues she is not estopped to assert her breach of contract claim. In her fourth issue, Richardson argues genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment dismissing her extra-contractual claims. Finally, in her fifth point, Richardson argues the trial erred in denying her motion to designate experts.

The Appraisal Procedure

 

  1. Applicable Law

Because courts “seek to implement the intention of the parties as expressed in the language of a contract,” it has long been the rule in Texas that “[a]ppraisal awards made pursuant to the provisions of an insurance contract are binding and enforceable.” Providence Lloyds Ins. Co. v. Crystal City Ind. Sch. Dist., 877 S.W.2d 872, 875 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1994, no writ) (citing Scottish Union and Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Clancy, 8 S.W. 630 (Tex. 1888)). “Although every reasonable presumption will typically be made in favor of an appraisal award, when reviewing a summary judgment proceeding, that rule must yield to the degree its application conflicts with the presumptions required to be made in favor of the nonmovant.” Wells v. Am. States Preferred Ins. Co., 919 S.W.2d 679, 683 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1996, writ denied) (citing Hennessey v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 895 S.W.2d 794, 797-98 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1995, writ denied)). There are three circumstances in which an appraisal award may be set aside on appeal: (1) the award was made without authority, (2) the award was made as a result of fraud or accident, or (3) the award was not make in substantial compliance with the terms of the insurance policy. Crystal City, 877 S.W.2d at 875-76.

  1. Analysis

In her first issue, Richardson argues the award in this case should be set aside because it was not made in substantial compliance with the policy. We agree. The policy expressly requires that the appraisers each make an itemized list, “stating separately the actual cash value and loss to each item.” It also requires the appraisers to submit to the umpire only the items on which the two appraisers fail to agree. The policy then requires at least two of these individuals must agree on the final appraisal award, and the final award must be “itemized.”
The record in this case does not reflect substantial compliance with this required procedure. There is no evidence in the record the appraisers made the requisite itemized lists or that they submitted only disputed items to the umpire for a decision. Instead, the record contains testimony that, prior to Montgomery and Greenhaw signing the award, Johnson never saw any written estimate from Greenhaw and did not meet with Greenhaw or Montgomery to discuss the appraisers’ disputed items. The record contains no itemized list prepared by either appraiser. There is testimony in the record that Johnson prepared a written estimate and forwarded it to the umpire, but that estimate is not in the record. There is no evidence that Johnson ever met with Greenhaw to discuss their itemized estimates so the appraisers could determine their differences. Moreover, the appraisal award signed by Montgomery and Greenhaw is not an “itemized decision” as required by the terms of the insurance policy. Instead, it merely reflects a lump-sum award written next to the phrase “to be determined by hygienist.”
Allstate argues that a document prepared by Greenhaw several days after Greenhaw and Montgomery signed the award “comprises the itemized decision upon which the appraisal award was based.” We reject this argument. A document prepared after the appraisal award was issued cannot, as a matter of common sense and law, constitute the itemized list Greenhaw was supposed to prepare before any award was issued. Allstate also argues the award is proper because “nothing in the policy requires that the two individuals agreeing on the award delineate every item to be replaced.” We agree that in a situation like this, in which raw sewage may have contaminated the entire contents of a home, it would not be necessary to list and separately appraise, for example, every item of clothing and kitchen utensil in the home. Nevertheless, we reject Allstate’s contention that the appraisers were entirely relieved of their obligation to make an itemized list that at least categorized the contents of the home in a manner customary in the insurance industry.
Under these facts, we conclude the appraisal award should be set aside because the award was not made in substantial compliance with the terms of the insurance policy. E.g., Fisch v. Transcon. Ins. Co., 356 S.W.2d 186, 189-90 (Tex. Civ. App.-Houston 1962, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (setting aside appraisal award because record contained no evidence appraisers failed to agree and only submitted disagreements to umpire, as required by policy) .

Conclusion
We reverse the trial court’s summary judgment and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d). The ultimate disposition of this case, including Richardson’s extra-contractual claims and Allstate’s affirmative defenses, will depend on the facts developed and decisions made during the further proceedings in the trial court. Accordingly , we need not address Richardson’s remaining issues at this time. Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.

SUE LAGARDE
JUSTICE, ASSIGNED

060100F.P05

Footnote 1 The Honorable Sue Lagarde, Justice, Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, Retired, sitting by assignment.

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas insurance defense lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

 

Attorney’s Fees-Lump Sum Permitted In Death Case Should Be Based On Present Value Of Future Benefits–Texas Workers’ Compensation Lawyers

ATTORNEY FEES–TEXAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAWYERS
Lump Sum Permitted In Death Case Should Be Based On Present Value Of Future Benefits
Texas Workers’ Compensation Insurance Fund v. Simon 1998 WL 538231 (Tex. App – San Antonio) August 26, 1998
The San Antonio Court of Appeals withdrew its opinion of June 3, 1998, and substituted this opinion to clarify that summary judgment motions were denied and that if Mrs. Simon is successful at trial, any damages award will be under the 1989 Act.
The Court stated again that the issue of whether the TWCIF waived its right to raise a causation issue had not been raised at the BRC or CCH and, therefore, could not be raised on appeal to civil court.
The issue in the case was whether Mr. Simon’s bee sting at the Damco Repair Shop that resulted in his death arose out of his employment. TWCIF introduced affidavits concerning the current conditions in the shop and Simon’s predisposition to react to bee stings. The Court stated that an affidavit of current conditions was not sufficient summary judgment evidence because it did not speak to the conditions in the Damco Repair Shop at the time of the incident. The Court also stated that a pre-existing condition such as a predisposition to a severe allergic reaction to a bee sting will not preclude compensation.
The Court distinguished this case from the Bratcher case at 823 S.W. 2d 720. Bratcher died of an aneurysm while straining to have a bowel movement. The Court in Bratcher denied recovery because the strain could have occurred at any time and there was no causal connection between the injury and the employment. In this case, however, there was evidence of an injury incident to employment.
With respect to attorney fees, the court stated that any lump sum attorney fees in the event Mrs. Simon prevails at trial, would be based on 25% of the present value of future benefits.

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas workers’ compensation defense lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

Insurance Liability Coverage and Limits Issues in Texas Trucking Accident Litigation–Texas Trucking Defense Attorneys

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
MARIA del CARMEN ESPARZA, §
Individually and as Next Friend of, §
MIGUEL ANGEL ESPARZA, a Minor, §
JUAN ESPARZA MANCILLA, a Minor, §
MANUEL ESPARZA-MANCILLA, a Minor, §
MELISSA ESPARZA MANSILLAS, a Minor, §
ROLANDO ESPARZA, a Minor, §
MICHELLE ESPARZA, a Minor, and as the §
Representative of the Estate of Manuel Esparza,§
Deceased, CANDELARIO ESPARZA, §
JAVIER ESPARZA, BRIGIDA CADENA, §
Individually and as Personal Representative §
of the Estate of J. MARCOS ESPARZA, §
CELIA MERCADO ESPARZA, §
Individually and as Representative of the §
Estate of MANUEL ESPARZA, Deceased §
and A/N/F of MANUEL ESPARZA §
MERCADO, a Minor, MANEOR ESPARZA §
ESPARZA and MA SANTOS ESPARZA § Case No. 4:05-CV-315
ZAPATA, Individually and as §
Representatives of the Estates of §
JUAN MARCOS ESPARZA and §
GERMAN ESPARZA, Deceased, and §
A/N/F of GRISELDA ESPARZA, a Minor, §
§
Plaintiffs, §
§
v. §
§
EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC., §
KV EXPRESS, INC., MIROSLAW JANUSZ §
JOZWIAK, ILLINOIS NATIONAL §
INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL §
CASUALTY COMPANY, and §
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, §
§
Defendants. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 20

-2-
JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, LEXINGTON
INSURANCE COMPANY AND ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY’S JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The following are pending before the court:
1. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s joint motion for summary judgment and brief
in support (docket entry #74);
2. Contractor Plaintiffs’ joint response to carrier Defendants’ joint motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #108);
3. Martin Plaintiffs’ joinder in Contractor Plaintiffs’ joint response to Carrier
Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment (docket entry #109);
4. Defendants Lexington Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s joint reply to Plaintiffs’ response to Carrier
Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment (docket entry #123); and
5. Contractor Plaintiffs’ sur-reply to the Carrier Defendants’ joint motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #127).
1. Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment and brief in support thereof (docket
entry #’s 91 & 94);
2. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s response to Plaintiffs’ joint motion for
summary judgment and supplement to Defendants Continental Casualty Company,
Lexington Insurance Company and Illinois National Insurance Company’s joint
motion for summary judgment (docket entry #110);
3. Contractor Plaintiffs’ amended joint reply brief to Carriers’ response to Plaintiffs’
joint motion for summary judgment (docket entry #130); and
4. Carrier Defendants’ joint sur-reply to Plaintiffs’ reply to Carrier Defendants’
response to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #128).
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 20

-3-
1. Contractor Plaintiffs’ joint motion to strike exhibits from Carriers’ joint response and
supplemental motion for summary judgment (docket entry #125);
2. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s response to Plaintiffs’ joint motion to strike
exhibits from Carriers’ joint response and supplemental motion for summary
judgment and, alternatively, motion for leave to supplement the record (docket entry
#’s 134 & 135); and
3. Plaintiffs’ response to Carriers’ response to Plaintiffs’ joint motion to strike exhibits
from Carriers’ joint response and supplemental motion for summary judgment and,
alternatively, motion for leave to supplement the record (docket entry #’s 156 &
157).
1. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia
Strickland and objections thereto (docket entry #147);
2. Contractor Plaintiffs’ first amended motion to strike affidavits of Cline Young and
Patricia Strickland and objections thereto (docket entry #160);
3. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s response to Contractor Plaintiffs’ amended
motion to strike affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia Strickland and objections
thereto (docket entry #167);
4. Contractor Plaintiffs’ reply to Carriers’ response to Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to
strike affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia Strickland and objections thereto
(docket entry #172); and
5. Illinois National’s sur-reply to Contractor Plaintiffs’ reply to Carriers’ response to
motion to strike the affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia Strickland and objections
thereto (docket entry #179).
1. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affidavit of Tina Jahn and objections thereto
(docket entry #149);
2. Continental Casualty Company’s response to Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike
affidavit of Tina Jahn and objections thereto (docket entry #166); and
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 3 of 20

-4-
3. Contractor Plaintiffs’ reply to Continental Casualty Company’s response to
Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affidavit of Tina Jahn and objections thereto
(docket entry #174).
1. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the response of Illinois National to the joinder
of Eagle Express Lines, Inc. in part of Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and to
strike the affidavit of Harrison Yoss and objections thereto (docket entry #162);
2. Illinois National’s response to Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the response of
Illinois National to the joinder of Eagle Express Lines, Inc. in part of Plaintiffs’
summary judgment motion and to strike the affidavit of Harrison Yoss and objections
thereto (docket entry #171); and
3. Contractor Plaintiffs’ reply to Illinois National’s response to Contractor Plaintiffs’
motion to strike the response of Illinois National to the joinder of Eagle Express
Lines, Inc. in part of Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and to strike the affidavit
of Harrison Yoss and objections thereto (docket entry #181).
1. Illinois National’s motion to substitute the affidavit of Harrison H. Yoss in
connection with its response to the joinder of Eagle Express Lines, Inc. in part of
Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion (docket entry #175); and
2. Contractor Plaintiffs’ response to Illinois National’s motion to substitute the affidavit
of Harrison H. Yoss (docket entry #182).
1. Continental Casualty Company’s motion for leave to file affidavit of Tina Jahn
(docket entry #189);
2. Contractor Plaintiffs’ response to Continental Casualty Company’s motion for leave
to file affidavit of Tina Jahn (docket entry #192); and
3. Continental Casualty Company’s reply to Contractor Plaintiffs’ response to
Continental Casualty Company’s motion for leave to file affidavit of Tina Jahn
(docket entry #193).
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 4 of 20

-5-
1. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file supplemental summary judgment evidence in
support of motion for summary judgment and response to motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #196);
2. Martin Plaintiffs’ joinder in Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to supplement Plaintiffs’
joint motion for summary judgment (docket entry #200); and
3. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s response to Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file
supplemental summary judgment evidence in support of motion for summary
judgment and response to motion for summary judgment (docket entry #203).
1. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to supplement Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #199); and
2. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s response to Plaintiffs’ motion to supplement
Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment (docket entry #201).
The court will address the above-referenced motions in turn.
OBJECTIONS, MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND MOTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT
A. DR. CLINE YOUNG
In response to the Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment, the Carrier Defendants, for
the first time, introduced the expert opinion of Dr. Cline Young. See Def. Resp. to Pl. Mtn. for
Summ. Judg., Exhs. Y(1), Y(2) & Y(3). The Carrier Defendants also sought to supplement their
motion for summary judgment with the same.
In his report, Dr. Young opines about the September 20, 2004 events which form the basis
of this lawsuit. Although the facts of this case are more specifically set forth below, Dr. Young, in
his March 15, 2006 report, provides the following opinions about the facts of this case:
2. The time between the collision of the truck with the Expedition
and the collision of the truck with the Pickup was approximately
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 5 of 20

-6-
0.1 ± 0.1 seconds with the collision between the truck and the
pickup occurring first. This time was calculated based on the points
of impact between the vehicles, the separation distances associated
with those points of impact, the angle at which the truck was crossing
the roadway at the impacts and the speed of the truck. A computer
simulation reflecting this analysis is attached. Note: Some of these
measurements were taken from a scaled drawing. More precise
measurements are possible from the actual measured data itself.
The author would like to have that data.
3. For all practical purposes, the two collisions can be considered to
be simultaneous. As can be seen from the data items wherein a
combined perception / reaction time of 1.5 seconds is generally used
in accident reconstruction, there is no possibility of Mr. Jozwiak
responding to the collision of his truck with Mr. Esparza’s pickup,
regain control and then have a second collision with Ms. Martin’s
vehicle. 1/10th of a second is essentially the time span of a blink of
the eye. Furthermore, besides the time needed for perception and
reaction, there is additional time needed for driver controls to take
effect on the motion of the vehicle.
Def. Resp. to Pl. Mtn. for Summ. Judg., Exh. Y(1).
The Carrier Defendants seek to introduce Dr. Young’s report to show that the collisions
occurred within approximately 1/10th of a second apart and that, as such, the collisions occurred
virtually simultaneously. Additionally, the Carrier Defendants seek to introduce Dr. Young’s report
to demonstrate that Jozwiak could not have regained control of his truck between the two collisions.
The Plaintiffs object to the introduction of Dr. Young’s report on several bases, most
important of which is that Dr. Young’s report is not based on an adequate factual foundation. The
court agrees. In addition to the above-referenced remarks, Dr. Young further states in his report that
he understands
. . . that discovery is still ongoing and thereby reserve[s] the right to alter or augment
this report and the opinions contained within should additional information become
available that warrants such action. More specifically, I would like to have the
government documents containing the measurements of the vehicles and the accident
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 6 of 20

1The court notes, however, that even if it did consider Dr. Young’s report, the result would not
change. Although Dr. Young’s report indicates that the collisions were, for all practical purposes,
simultaneous, Dr. Young’s opinions reveal that the collisions were separated in time, albeit a short period
of time. As such, the fact remains that the collisions did not result from a simultaneous impact.
-7-
site in both printed and electronic formats.
Def. Resp. to Pl. Mtn. for Summ. Judg., Exh. Y(1). Although Dr. Young, in a later filed affidavit,
states that his conclusions and opinions are based on “all available measurements,” Dr. Young did
not mention any review of the actual measured data from the vehicles and the accident site. Since
Dr. Young specifically noted that more precise measurements were possible from the actual
measured data and since there is no indication that Dr. Young reviewed such data, the court
concludes that Dr. Young’s report is not based on an adequate factual foundation. Accordingly, the
court declines to consider Dr. Young’s report and hereby strikes it from the record.1
B. THE NTSB REPORT
The Carrier Defendants have further offered as summary judgment evidence the National
Transportation Safety Board’s (“NTSB”) report. The Plaintiffs object to the admission of the same
because “[n]o part of a report of the [NTSB], related to an accident or an investigation of an accident,
may be admitted into evidence or used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter
mentioned in the report.” 49 U.S.C. § 1154(b). The Carrier Defendants argue, however, that the
report was not offered for the truth of the matter asserted but, rather, to show that the NTSB referred
to the events which transpired on September 20, 2004 as a single accident. Since consideration of
the NTSB report appears to be prohibited by statute, the court hereby declines to consider the same
and strikes the report from the record.
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 7 of 20

2The court notes that resolution of the Plaintiffs’ affirmative defenses of waiver and estoppel
cannot be accomplished via a motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact have
been raised regarding the same.
-8-
C. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS LETTERS AND EVIDENCE RELATED THERETO
In their joint motion for summary judgment and in their response to the Carrier Defendants’
motion for summary judgment, the Plaintiffs raised the affirmative defenses of waiver and estoppel.
The Plaintiffs argue that the Carrier Defendants waived (or are estopped from raising) their right to
assert that the events which transpired on September 20, 2004 resulted in a single accident. As
discussed more fully below, the court concludes that the events which transpired on September 20,
2004 resulted in two accidents. As such, it is not necessary for the court to reach the Plaintiffs’
affirmative defenses of waiver and estoppel.2 Accordingly, the court overrules the Plaintiffs’
objections to Exhibits Z and CC of the Carrier Defendants’ response to the Plaintiff’s joint motion
for summary judgment as moot. Additionally, the court denies as moot all other motions related to
the affirmative defenses of waiver and estoppel.
D. SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
The Plaintiffs seek to supplement their summary judgment evidence with certain deposition
testimony which refutes the expert opinions of Dr. Young. Since the court is not considering Dr.
Young’s expert opinions, it is not necessary for the Plaintiffs to supplement their summary judgment
evidence with this additional testimony. Likewise, it is not necessary for the Carrier Defendants to
supplement said deposition testimony with additional portions of the same.
BACKGROUND
On September 20, 2004, Miroslaw Janusz Jozwiak (“Jozwiak”) was driving a tractor-trailer
rig (“tractor-trailer”) northbound on U.S. Highway 75 near Sherman, Texas. KV Express, Inc.
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 8 of 20

-9-
(“KV”) owned the tractor while Eagle Express Lines, Inc. (“Eagle Express”) owned the trailer.
Jozwiak crossed the median on U.S. Highway 75 and collided with two vehicles traveling
southbound on U.S. Highway 75. Those two vehicles were a Ford F-150 pick-up truck (“the truck”)
and a Ford Expedition (“the Expedition”). Although it is unclear which vehicle was first impacted
by the tractor-trailer, the resolution of that issue is not relevant to the determination of the issues
currently before the court.
It is clear, however, that the tractor-trailer (apparently, the trailer portion of the rig) collided
with the truck while the truck was traveling southbound in the left lane. Of the seven individuals
traveling in the truck, five were fatally injured. The two survivors were seriously injured.
It is also clear that the tractor-trailer (apparently, the tractor portion of the rig) collided with
the Expedition while the Expedition was traveling southbound in the right lane. At some time after
impact, the Expedition and tractor, as well as a portion of the trailer, burst into flames. Five
individuals were traveling in the Expedition; none survived. Jozwiak survived with minimal
injuries.
At the time of the September 20, 2004 events, Illinois National Insurance Company provided
truckers’ liability insurance coverage to KV (the “Illinois National Policy”) under policy number
SFT165302601. The Illinois National Policy provides $1,000,000 in primary coverage for each
“accident.”
Additionally, Continental Casualty Company provided truckers’ liability insurance coverage
to Eagle Express (the “Continental Casualty Policy”) under policy number 0 1080827873. The
Continental Casualty Policy provides for $1,000,000 in coverage for each “accident.”
Finally, Lexington Insurance Company provided excess insurance coverage to Eagle Express
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 9 of 20

3Additionally, in the event the court concludes that the September 20, 2004 events involved a
single accident / occurrence under the terms of the insurance policies, the Plaintiffs seek a declaration
that the MCS-90 endorsements contained within the primary insurance policies provide for either
$1,000,000 per judgment or, in the alternative, that the endorsements require a finding of two distinct
collisions. Since the court concludes that the plain language of the policies mandates a finding of two
accidents / occurrences, the court need not reach the issues concerning the MCS-90 endorsements.
-10-
(the “Lexington Policy”) under policy number 3167729. The Lexington Policy provides for
$1,000,000 in coverage for each “occurrence.” In this declaratory judgment action, the parties seek
a declaration under the terms of the insurance policies as to whether the events which transpired on
September 20, 2004 involved one or two accidents / occurrences.3
LEGAL STANDARD
The purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims
or defenses. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 327 (1986). Summary judgment is proper
if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the
affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). A dispute about a material fact
is genuine “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving
party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). The trial court must resolve all
reasonable doubts in favor of the party opposing the motion for summary judgment. Casey
Enterprises, Inc. v. American Hardware Mut. Ins. Co., 655 F.2d 598, 602 (5th Cir. 1981)(citations
omitted). The substantive law identifies which facts are material. See id. at 248.
The party moving for summary judgment has the burden to show that there is no genuine
issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id. at 247. If the
movant bears the burden of proof on a claim or defense on which it is moving for summary
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 10 of 20

-11-
judgment, it must come forward with evidence that establishes “beyond peradventure all of the
essential elements of the claim or defense.” Fontenot v. Upjohn Co., 780 F.2d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir.
1986). But if the nonmovant bears the burden of proof, the movant may discharge its burden by
showing that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmovant’s case. Celotex, 477 U.S.
at 323, 325; Byers v. Dallas Morning News, Inc., 209 F.3d 419, 424 (5th Cir. 2000). Once the
movant has carried its burden, the nonmovant “must set forth specific facts showing that there is a
genuine issue for trial.” FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). The nonmovant must adduce affirmative evidence.
See Anderson, 477 U.S. at 257.
CHOICE OF LAW
In the Carrier Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Carrier Defendants refer the
court to both Texas law and Illinois law. The Carrier Defendants argue that this court should apply
Illinois law because, under the most significant relationship test, the insurance policies at issue were
purchased by, and issued to, the insureds in Illinois. Accordingly, the Carrier Defendants reason that
“Illinois law applies to the interpretation of the insurance policies at issue, as Illinois bears the most
significant relationship to such policies.” Def. Reply, p. 2, ¶ 2. The Carrier Defendants note,
however, that since both Illinois and Texas apply the same analysis to determine whether the events
herein involve one accident or two, the results would be the same under both states’ laws.
“‘If the laws of the states do not conflict, then no choice-of-law analysis is necessary.’”
Schneider National Transport v. Ford Motor Co., 280 F.3d 532, 536 (5th Cir. 2002), quoting W.R.
Grace and Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 896 F.2d 865, 874 (5th Cir. 1990); National Union Fire Ins.
v. CNA Ins. Companies, 28 F.3d 29, 32, n. 3 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, in this diversity suit, the
law of the forum state, Texas, should apply here because there is no conflict between the substantive
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 11 of 20

-12-
state law of Texas and Illinois. See Schneider National Transport, 280 F.3d at 536.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
“A contract of insurance is generally subject to the same rules of construction as other
contracts.” H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 150 F.3d 526,
529 (5th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted). “The court’s primary concern is to give effect to the written
expression of the parties’ intent.” Id. (citation omitted). “If the written contract is worded so that
it can be given a definite or certain legal meaning, it is not ambiguous and will be enforced as
written.” Id. (citation omitted).
“If the court is uncertain as to which of two or more meanings was intended, a provision is
ambiguous.” Id. (citation omitted). “An ambiguity in a contract is either ‘patent’ or ‘latent.’” Id.
(citation omitted). “‘A patent ambiguity is evident on the face of the contract. A latent ambiguity
arises when a contract which is unambiguous on its face is applied to the subject matter with which
it deals and an ambiguity appears by reason of some collateral matter.’” Id., quoting National Union
Fire Ins. Co. v. CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995). “Only after a court has
determined a contract is ambiguous can it consider the parties’ interpretations.” Id. (citation
omitted). “When a contract is not ambiguous, the court will construe the contract as a matter of
law.” Id. (citation omitted).
The outcome of this case depends on the meaning of “accident” and “occurrence” as defined
by the policies herein. See H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 150 F.3d at 529. The Carrier Defendants argue
that the plain language of the polices results in a finding of one accident or occurrence. Conversely,
the Plaintiffs contend that the plain language of the policies results in a finding of two accidents or
occurrences. Alternatively, the Plaintiffs argue that the policies’ provisions are ambiguous;
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 12 of 20

-13-
accordingly, the court should interpret the ambiguity in favor of coverage and find two accidents or
occurrences as a matter of law.
The Lexington Policy provides coverage as follows:
I. COVERAGE
A. We will pay on behalf of the Insured that portion of the loss which the
Insured will become legally obligated to pay as compensatory
damages (excluding all fines, penalties, punitive or exemplary
damages) by reason of exhaustion of all applicable underlying limits,
whether collectible or not, as specified in Section II of the
Declarations, subject to:
1. the terms and conditions of the underlying policy listed in
Section IIA of the Declarations, AND
2. our Limit of Liability as stated in Section 1C of the
Declarations.
III. LIMITS OF LIABILITY
A. Aggregate
This policy is subject to an aggregate limit of liability as stated in the
Declarations. This aggregate limit of liability is the maximum
amount which will be paid under this policy for all losses in excess
of the underlying policy limits occurring during the policy period,
except automobile liability for which there is no applicable aggregate
limit of liability.
B. Occurrence Limit
Subject to the above provision respecting aggregate, the Limit of
Liability stated in the Declarations as per occurrence is the total limit
of our liability for ultimate net loss including damages for care, loss
of services or loss of consortium because of personal injury and
property damage combined, sustained by one or more persons or
organizations as a result of any one (1) occurrence.
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 13 of 20

-14-
C. Limit Exhaustion
This policy shall cease to apply after the applicable limits of liability
have been exhausted by payments of defense costs and / or judgments
and / or settlements.
In the event of exhaustion of the aggregate limits of liability of the
underlying insurance as stated in Section II of the Declarations, this
policy will continue in force as underlying insurance.
The aggregate limits of the underlying insurance will only be reduced
or exhausted by payment of claims that would be insured by this
policy.
Def. Jt. Mtn. for Summ. Judg., Exh. A, pp. 1-2. The Lexington Policy defines “occurrence” as
follows:
The word occurrence means an event, including continuous or repeated exposures to
conditions, neither expected or intended from the standpoint of the Insured. All such
exposure to substantially the same general conditions shall be deemed one
occurrence.
Id. at 4.
The Continental Casualty Policy and the Illinois National Policy provide coverage as follows:
SECTION II – LIABILITY COVERAGE
A. Coverage
We will pay all sums an “insured” legally must pay as damages because of
“bodily injury” or “property damage” to which this insurance applies, caused
by an “accident” and resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of a
covered “auto”.
C. Limit Of Insurance
Regardless of the number of covered “autos”, “insureds”, premiums paid,
claims made or vehicles involved in the “accident”, the most we will pay for
the total of all damages and “covered pollution cost or expense” combined,
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 14 of 20

4Again, the court notes that the Plaintiffs seek a finding of ambiguity only in the alternative.
-15-
resulting from any one “accident” is the Limit of Insurance for Liability
Coverage shown in the Declarations.
All “bodily injury”, “property damage” and “covered pollution cost or
expense” resulting from continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the
same conditions will be considered as resulting from one “accident”.
Id. at Exh. B, pp. 2, 5; Exh. C, pp. 2, 5-6. The Continental Casualty Policy and the Illinois National
Policy define “accident” as follows:
“Accident” includes continuous or repeated exposure to the same conditions resulting
in “bodily injury” or “property damage”.
Id. at Exh. B, p. 10, § VI(A), Exh. C, p. 11, § VI(A).
Here, none of the parties primarily contend that the terms “accident” and “occurrence” as
defined by the policies are ambiguous.4 See U.E. Texas One-Barrington, Ltd., v. General Star
Indemnity Co., 332 F.3d 274, 277 (5th Cir. 2003). Further, the parties do not argue that the court’s
determination of the number of accidents or occurrences hinges on the resolution of a factual dispute.
See id. Accordingly, “Texas courts agree that the proper focus in interpreting ‘occurrence’ is on the
events that cause the injuries and give rise to the insured’s liability, rather than on the number of
injurious effects.” H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 150 F.3d at 530, quoting Maurice Pincoffs Co. v. St. Paul
Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 447 F.2d 204, 206 (5th Cir. 1971).
In H.E. Butt Grocery Co., an insurance coverage dispute arose from an H.E. Butt Grocery
Company’s (“HEB”) employee’s sexual abuse of two children in an HEB store. H.E. Butt Grocery
Co., 150 F.3d at 528. An HEB employee sexually assaulted two different children approximately
one week apart in the restroom of an HEB store. Id. Litigation ensued which subsequently led to
HEB seeking a declaratory judgment against National Union Fire Insurance Company. HEB argued
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 15 of 20

-16-
that each instance of sexual abuse arose from the same “occurrence”, i.e., HEB’s negligence in
overseeing its pedophilic employee. Id. Conversely, National Union Fire Insurance Company
argued that the two separate instances of sexual abuse constituted two occurrences under the policy.
Id. The policy defined “occurrence” as follows:
“Occurrence” means an event, including continuous or repeated exposure to
conditions, which result[s] in Personal Injury or Property Damage during the policy
period, neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured. All
Personal Injury or Property Damage arising out of the continuous or repeated
exposure to substantially the same general conditions shall be considered as arising
out of one occurrence.
H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 150 F.3d at 529. The court concluded that “the two independent acts of
sexual abuse ‘caused’ the two children’s injuries and gave rise to HEB’s separate and distinct
liability in each case.” Id. at 531.
Likewise, in Maurice Pincoffs Co., supra., an insurance coverage dispute arose from the sale
of contaminated birdseed. Maurice Pincoffs Co., 447 F.2d at 205. Maurice Pincoffs Company
imported 110,000 pounds of canary seed from Argentina. Id. The birdseed was sold in the original
110 pound bags to eight different feed and grain dealers in Texas and Oklahoma. Id. The dealers,
in turn, sold the birdseed to bird owners. Id. The birdseed, apparently contaminated with a chemical
insecticide toxic to birds, killed many birds. Id. Litigation ensued which eventually led to a
declaratory judgment action. The central issue was whether there was one “occurrence” of liability
or more than one “occurrence” of liability under the insurance policy at issue. Id. at 206. The policy
defined “occurrence” as follows:
“Occurrence” means an accident, including injurious exposure to conditions, which
results, during the policy period, in bodily injury or property damage neither expected
nor intended from the standpoint of the insured.
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 16 of 20

-17-
Id. In finding that there was more than one occurrence of liability, the court reasoned as follows:
We think that the ‘occurrence’ to which the policy must refer is the
occurrence of the events or incidents for which Pincoffs is liable. It was the sale of
the contaminated seed for which Pincoffs was liable. Although the cause of the
contamination is not clear, it seems apparent that Pincoffs received the seed in a
contaminated condition and did not itself contaminate the seed. However, it was not
the act of contamination which subjected Pincoffs to liability. If Pincoffs had
destroyed the seed before sale, for instance, there would be no occurrence at all for
which the insured would be liable. But once a sale was made there would be liability
for any resulting damages. It was the sale that created the exposure to ‘a condition
which resulted in property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint
of the insured,’ under the definition of the policy. And for each of the eight sales
made by Pincoffs, there was a new exposure and another occurrence.
Id.
Moreover, in Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Rawls, 404 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1968), the single
question presented to the court was whether the insured had been involved in one accident or two
accidents. As the insured was proceeding north upon a public highway at a high rate of speed, he
collided with the left rear of a northbound automobile and knocked it off the highway to the right.
Id. The insured continued northerly, veering across the centerline and collided head-on with a
southbound automobile. Id. The impacts were separated by both time (two to five seconds) and
distance (30 to 300 feet apart). Id. In finding as a matter of law that there were two accidents, the
court reasoned as follows:
There were two distinct collisions, or more than a single sudden collision. There is
no evidence that the [insured’s] automobile went out of control after striking the rear
end of appellees’ automobile. On the contrary, the only reasonable inference is that
[the insured] had control of his vehicle after the initial collision.
Id. at 880.
Here, the Carrier Defendants argue that both the truck and the Expedition were exposed to
continuous or repeated exposure to the same condition, that is, Jozwiak crossing the median into the
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 17 of 20

5The Carrier Defendants have provided the court with numerous newspaper articles which refer
to the events which transpired on September 20, 2004 as a single accident. The court notes, however,
that the authors of those articles were not construing the terms of the insurance policies herein.
-18-
southbound lanes of U.S. Highway 75. The Carrier Defendants contend that the tractor-trailer
crossed into southbound traffic in one continuous event. The Carrier Defendants further argue that
the evidence does not indicate that the tractor-trailer stopped and then started again, nor does the
evidence indicate that Jozwiak lost control of the tractor-trailer and then subsequently regained
control. The Carrier Defendants apply the following reasoning:
There is no evidence showing that Jozwiak regained control between the two
collisions. In fact, as the entire accident occurred within seconds, . . ., it would have
been impossible for Jozwiak to regain control after hitting the Expedition and before
hitting the pickup truck.
Based on the distance between the cars in the southbound lanes prior to the
first collision, the rapid succession of the collisions and the absence of any evidence
showing that Jozwiak ever regained control of the tractor-trailer after the first
collision, . . ., this Court must find that there was only one accident / occurrence. . .
The collisions in this case resulted from the same cause – namely, a tractor-trailer
that struck two cars before coming to rest. Thus, under the terms of the insurance
policies at issue, there was a single accident / occurrence.
Def. Jt. Mtn. for Summ. Judg., p. 13.5
The court concludes that the Carrier Defendants’ arguments are over-reaching. First, as
likened to the facts of Maurice Pincoffs, if the tractor-trailer had crossed the median into the
southbound lanes of traffic but there were no oncoming vehicles, then the insureds would not be
subject to liability. Under the theory propounded by the court in Maurice Pincoffs, it was each
collision in the instant case that created the continuous or repeated exposure to the same, or
substantially the same, conditions, not the fact that the tractor-trailer crossed the median. Second,
it is clear that each collision occurred independently. Regardless of which collision occurred first,
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 18 of 20

6In the Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment, the Plaintiffs raise the issue that the
Carrier Defendants appear to contend that the policy limits have been exhausted as a result of a
settlement reached with certain Plaintiffs. The court, however, denied the motion to approve that
settlement. Furthermore, the policies state that exhaustion occurs upon payment of any judgments or
settlements. Since the court has neither approved any settlements nor entered any judgments, the policy
limits have not yet been exhausted.
-19-
the collision between the tractor-trailer and the truck did not cause or affect the collision between
the tractor-trailer and the Expedition. The truck’s collision with the tractor-trailer did not cause the
truck to spin out of control into the Expedition. Likewise, the Expedition’s collision with the tractortrailer
did not cause the Expedition to spin out of control into the truck. Similarly, neither the truck’s
nor the Expedition’s collision with the tractor-trailer caused the tractor-trailer to lose control and
collide with any other vehicle. In following the teachings of H.E. Butt Grocery Co., the court must
conclude that each individual collision with the tractor-trailer created the continuous or repeated
exposure to the same, or substantially the same, conditions. See H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 150 F.3d
at 533. Finally, as in Rawls, the collisions were separated by both time and distance. All of the
foregoing leads the court to the conclusion that, as a matter of law, the events which transpired on
September 20, 2004 resulted in two separate accidents or occurrences. The court reaches this
conclusion by looking to the events that caused the injuries and gave rise to the insureds’ liability,
not to the number of injuries or the number of victims. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 150 F.3d at 535.6
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the court concludes as follows:
1. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s joint motion for summary judgment and brief
in support (docket entry #74) is DENIED IN PART;
2. Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment and brief in support thereof (docket
entry #’s 91 & 94) is GRANTED IN PART;
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 19 of 20

-20-
3. Contractor Plaintiffs’ joint motion to strike exhibits from Carriers’ joint response and
supplemental motion for summary judgment (docket entry #125) is GRANTED IN
PART;
4. Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company and
Illinois National Insurance Company’s motion for leave to supplement the record
(docket entry #135) is DENIED;
5. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia
Strickland and objections thereto (docket entry #147) and Contractor Plaintiffs’ first
amended motion to strike affidavits of Cline Young and Patricia Strickland and
objections thereto (docket entry #160) are GRANTED IN PART;
6. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike affidavit of Tina Jahn and objections thereto
(docket entry #149) is DENIED AS MOOT;
7. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to supplement the record (docket entry #156) is
DENIED;
8. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the response of Illinois National to the joinder
of Eagle Express Lines, Inc. in part of Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and to
strike the affidavit of Harrison Yoss and objections thereto (docket entry #162) is
DENIED AS MOOT;
9. Illinois National’s motion to substitute the affidavit of Harrison H. Yoss in
connection with its response to the joinder of Eagle Express Lines, Inc. in part of
Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion (docket entry #175) is DENIED AS MOOT;
10. Continental Casualty Company’s motion for leave to file affidavit of Tina Jahn
(docket entry #189) is DENIED AS MOOT;
11. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file supplemental summary judgment evidence in
support of motion for summary judgment and response to motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #196) is DENIED; and
12. Contractor Plaintiffs’ motion to supplement Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary
judgment (docket entry #199) is DENIED.
Case 4:05-cv-00315-RAS Document 232 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 20 of 20

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas trucking defense lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

TWC–Texas Unemployment Benefits Eligibility–Ft. Worth Employment Law Attorneys

TWC evaluates  unemployment benefits claim based on:

  • Past wages
  • Job separation(s)
  • Ongoing eligibility requirements

The employee must meet all requirements in each of these three areas to qualify for unemployment benefits.

Past Wages

Your past wages are one of the eligibility requirements and the basis of your potential unemployment benefit amounts. We use the taxable wages, earned in Texas, your employer(s) have reported paying you during your base period to calculate your benefits. If you worked in more than one state, see If You Earned Wages in More than One State.

Base Period

Your base period is the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters before the effective date of your initial claim. We do not use the quarter in which you file or the quarter before that; we use the one-year period before those two quarters. The effective date is the Sunday of the week in which you apply. The chart below can help you determine your base period. If you do not have enough wages from employment in the base period, TWC cannot pay you benefits.

To have a payable claim, you must meet all of the following requirements:

  • You have wages in more than one of the four base period calendar quarters.
  • Your total base period wages are at least 37 times your weekly benefit amount.
  • If you qualified for benefits on a prior claim, you must have earned six times your new weekly benefit amount since that time.
A base period is the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters immediately preceding the date of an initial claim for unemployment compensation.

Alternate Base Period

If you were out of work for a long period during your base period because of a medically verifiable illness, injury, disability or pregnancy, you may be able to use an alternate base period. Call a TWC Tele-Center at 800-939-6631 to ask if you qualify for an alternate base period.

Types of Job Separation

To be eligible for benefits based on your job separation, you must be either unemployed or working reduced hours through no fault of your own. Examples include layoff, reduction in hours or wages not related to misconduct, being fired for reasons other than misconduct, or quitting with good cause related to work.

Laid Off

Layoffs are due to lack of work, not your work performance, so you may be eligible for benefits. For example, the employer has no more work available, has eliminated your position, or has closed the business.

Working Reduced Hours

If you are working but your employer reduced your hours, you may be eligible for benefits. Your reduction in hours must not be the result of a disciplinary action or due to your request.

Fired

If the employer ended your employment but you were not laid off as defined above, then you were fired. If the employer demanded your resignation, you were fired.

You may be eligible for benefits if you were fired for reasons other than misconduct. Examples of misconduct that could make you ineligible include violation of company policy, violation of law, neglect or mismanagement of your position, or failure to perform your work adequately if you are capable of doing so.

Quit

If you chose to end your employment, then you quit. Most people who quit their jobs do not receive unemployment benefits. For example, if you quit your job for personal reasons, such as lack of transportation or stay home with your children, we cannot pay you benefits.

You may be eligible for benefits if you quit for one of the reasons listed below:

  • Quit for good cause connected with the work, which means a work-related reason that would make an individual who wants to remain employed leave employment. You should be able to present evidence that you tried to correct work-related problems before you quit.
    Examples of quitting for good work-related reason are well-documented instances of:

  • Quit for a good reason not related to work, under limited circumstances. Examples include leaving work because:
  • Quit to move with your spouse when the move is not part of a qualifying military permanent change of station (PCS). You may be eligible for benefits but you will be disqualified for 6 to 25 weeks, depending on the situation. Your maximum benefit amount is also reduced by the number of disqualified weeks.

Labor Dispute

If you are involved in a labor dispute or strike, see more information at If You are Involved in a Labor Dispute or Strike.

Ongoing Eligibility Requirements

In addition to the past wages and job separation eligibility requirements, there are requirements you must continue to meet to stay eligible. See Ongoing Eligibility Requirements for Receiving Unemployment Benefits.

Benefit Amounts

We will mail you a statement with your potential benefit amounts after you file your claim. You may use the TWC Benefits Estimator to estimate your potential benefit amounts. The estimator cannot tell you whether you qualify for unemployment benefits.

Your benefit amounts are based on your past wages. How we calculate benefits is explained below.

Weekly Benefit Amount

Your weekly benefit amount (WBA) is the amount you receive for weeks you are eligible for benefits. Your WBA will be between $64 and $465 (minimum and maximum weekly benefit amounts in Texas) depending on your past wages.

To calculate your WBA, we divide your base period quarter with the highest wages by 25 and round to the nearest dollar.

If you work during a week for which you are requesting payment, you must report your work. Wages earned may affect your benefit amounts.

Maximum Benefit Amount

Your maximum benefit amount (MBA) is the total amount you can receive during your benefit year. Your MBA is 26 times your weekly benefit amount or 27 percent of all your wages in the base period, whichever is less. To receive benefits, you must be totally or partially unemployed and meet the eligibility requirements.

Your benefit year begins on the Sunday of the week in which you applied for benefits and remains in effect for 52 weeks. Your benefit year stays in effect for those dates even if TWC disqualifies you or you receive all of your benefits. You may run out of benefits before your benefit year expires.

Special Sources of Wages or Types of Employment

Child Support Obligation

If you owe court-ordered child support, we will reduce your weekly payment by up to 50 percent to pay your child support. The Office of Attorney General (OAG) notifies TWC if you owe child support. We deduct the amount directly from your payment and send the funds to OAG, who will give the money to the custodial parent.

 

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas employment law defense lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

 

Fort Worth–Attorney’s Fees in Texas Workers’ Compensation Subrogation Law–Awarded to Claimant’s Attorney From State’s Recovery

TEXAS ATTORNEY FEES IN FORT WORTH–SUBROGATION LAW
In Subrogation/Awarded Claimant’s Attorney From State of Texas Recovery
Texas Depart Of Transportation v. Wilson 1998 WL 784033 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth) Nov. 12, 1998
Wilson, a TXDOT employee, was involved in an auto accident with King. Wilson’s attorney, Wood, filed suit against King for negligence and King’s Carrier settled the lawsuit for $75,000. The Attorney General then intervened to collect its $70,000 subrogation lien. The Trial Court relied on Section 417.003 and distributed over $20,000 in attorney fees to Wood.
The Court of Appeals for Fort Worth affirmed. The State is treated as an insurance carrier for workers’ compensation purposes. The Attorney General complained that, under Section 417.003(a), a private attorney must be retained by a state agency before he can receive payment. The Court responded, however, that under Section 417.003(c), the Court can apportion part of the insurance carrier’s subrogration recovery as attorney fees for the employee’s attorney and attorney fees for the insurance carrier’s attorney if the carrier’s attorney actively participated in obtaining the subrogration recovery. Here, the Attorney General was awarded some fees and the Court deemed that those fees were earned by representing the Attorney General and that Wood’s fees were earned while representing Wilson.

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas subrogation lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

Attorney’s Fees Not Recoverable When No Party Prevails On SIB’s In Texas Workers’ Compensation Attorney’s Fees case

ATTORNEY FEES
Texas Attorney’s Fee in Workers’ Compensation Case Not Recoverable When No Party Prevails On SIB’s
Cigna Ins. Co. Of Texas vs. Middleton, 2001 WL 1557791 (Tex.App.-Eastland)
December 6, 2001
In this Texas Workers’ Compensation Attorney’s Fees case, the court ruled that attorney fees are not to be recovered by the claimant in an impairment rating dispute. In this case, Middleton II, the parties had each appealed TWCC determinations on SIBs into district court. All of the cases were consolidated. Both parties nonsuited the SIBs issues, and the carrier appealed the trial court’s award of attorney fees to the claimant. Because the underlying SIBs issues were nonsuited, the court ruled that there was no basis to award attorney fees. Attorney fees may only be awarded to the claimant when the claimant prevails in a SIBs dispute.

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas workers’ compensation defense lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

Texas Civil Litigation Attorneys–Jury Trial Juror Questionnaire–Northern District of Texas–U.S. District Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § VS. § ACTION NO. -CR- § DEFENDANT (2) § NOTICE OF FINAL VERSION OF JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE The parties to this cause filed lengthy witness lists on September 18, 1995, the deadline established by the scheduling order issued in this cause. The court has added question number 124 to the juror questionnaire, which asks if the jury panel member knows of has heard of any of the potential witnesses in this cause. Persons whose names are listed on both parties’ witness lists are listed only once in question number 124, where the names on both lists match identically. However, if the government’s list contained only a first initial and surname (i.e. “D. Lowrey”), and the defendant’s list contained a similar full name (i.e. “Debbie Lowrey”), both names are listed. Additionally, the Court has added Assistant United States Attorney _________’s name to question number 110. Finally, the Court modified the language of letter “m” on page twenty-nine of the questionnaire. A copy of the final version of the juror questionnaire is attached as an exhibit to this order. SIGNED September 20, 1995. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § VS. § CRIMINAL NO. -CR- § DEFENDANT (2) § JUROR NO. ___________ JUROR INFORMATION SHEET INSTRUCTIONS: Your answers to the following questions are very important to the trial of this case, and are designed to shorten the jury selection process. Do not discuss any of these questions or your answers with anyone else, including any other prospective jurors. Please take as much time as is reasonably necessary to answer each question as completely and as honestly as possible. Please do not accept the assistance or the advice of anyone in answering these questions. If any questions should arise while completing this questionnaire, please contact the presiding judge. Do not speak to anyone else about the questionnaire or any questions you might have. YOUR ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS ARE BEING GIVEN UNDER OATH The answers to these questions will be used by the Court and the attorneys solely for the selection of the jury in this case and for no other reason. The confidentiality of your answers to these questions will be maintained by the Court. Exhibit PLEASE PRINT YOUR ANSWERS PERSONAL 1. NAME: ___________________________________________________________ (first) (middle) (last) (maiden, if applicable) DATE OF BIRTH: ______________ AGE: ____ SEX: ____ RACE: __________ BIRTHPLACE: _____________________________ SSN: __________________ (city/town) (state) 2. ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________ (number and street) (city/town) (zip) HOME PHONE: (____)_____________ BUSINESS PHONE: (___)__________ 3. LENGTH OF TIME AT PRESENT ADDRESS: _________________________ 4. SINCE 1980 WHAT OTHER CITIES HAVE YOU LIVED IN AND FOR HOW LONG DID YOU LIVE IN EACH CITY? ______________________________ _________________________________________________________________ EMPLOYMENT 5. PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT: ________________________________________ 6. JOB TITLE OR DESCRIPTION: _____________________________________ BUSINESS HOURS: ______ LENGTH OF PRESENT EMPLOYMENT: _____ SUPERVISOR: _____________________________ 7. PLEASE LIST YOUR OCCUPATION OR EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PAST TEN (10) YEARS: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 8. WHAT OTHER TYPES OF JOBS HAVE YOU HELD? ___________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ If you could change your profession, what would you change it to? ___________ _________________________________________________________________ FAMILY 9. MARTIAL STATUS: (circle appropriate answer(s)) a). Married b). Single c). Separated d). Divorced e). Spouse Deceased f). Previously Divorced (how many times ____) g). Living With Someone 10. NAME OF SPOUSE: _______________________________________________ (first) (middle) (last) (maiden, if applicable) 11. SPOUSE’S EMPLOYER: ____________________________________________ Job Title Or Description: _____________________________________________ Length Of Present Employment: _______________________________________ What Other Types Of Jobs Has Your Spouse Held? ________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 12. PLEASE INDICATE THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL ANNUAL GROSS INCOME OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD: UNDER $10,000 _________________ $10,000 TO $30,000 ____________ $30,000 TO $50,000 ______________ $50,000 TO $70,000 ____________ $70,000 TO $100,000 _____________ Over $100,000 _________________ 13. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN AND STEPCHILDREN, IF ANY: Name Sex Age School or Occupation a. _____________________________________________________________ b. _____________________________________________________________ c. _____________________________________________________________ d. _____________________________________________________________ e. _____________________________________________________________ f. _____________________________________________________________ 14. IF YOU HAVE GRANDCHILDREN, HOW MANY? ___________________ 15. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PARENTS AND YOUR STEPPARENTS, IF ANY: Name Age City of Residence Retired Occupation/Employment (before retirement, if applicable) Father: ______________________________________________________________________ Mother: _____________________________________________________________________ Stepfather: ___________________________________________________________________ Stepmother: __________________________________________________________________ Were Your Parents Ever Divorced? ___________________________________ 16. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS, IF ANY? Name Sex Age School or Occupation a. ______________________________________________________________ b. ______________________________________________________________ c. ______________________________________________________________ d. ______________________________________________________________ e. ______________________________________________________________ f. ______________________________________________________________ EDUCATION 17. PLEASE GIVE YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND. PLEASE INCLUDE HOW FAR YOU WENT IN SCHOOL; THE NAMES OF ANY TECHNICAL OR TRADE SCHOOLS ATTENDED; ANY COLLEGE AND GRADUATE SCHOOLS YOU HAVE ATTENDED, TOGETHER WITH MAJOR SUBJECT AND DEGREES RECEIVED, IF ANY: _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 18. PLEASE GIVE YOUR SPOUSE’S EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 19. ARE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE PRESENTLY ENROLLED AS A STUDENT? IF SO, PLEASE GIVE DETAILS: _____________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ MILITARY 20. HAVE YOU EVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY? _____ IF SO, PLEASE GIVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Branch _____________, Years of Service ______________, Enlist? ____________, Re-enlist? _________ Highest grade or rank attained: ________________________________________ Duties: ___________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Did you serve in combat? _______________ Year Discharged? ______________ Type of Discharge: ___________________ Did you participate in any Courts Martial? ___________ Please Explain: __________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Did you ever serve in the military police? ________________________________ 21. HAS YOUR SPOUSE EVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY? _____ IF SO, PLEASE GIVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Branch ___________, Years of Service _____________, Enlist? _________, Re-enlist? _____________ Highest grade or rank attained: ________________________________________ Duties: ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Did he/she serve in combat? __________________ Year Discharged? _________ Type of Discharge: _________________________ Did he/she participate in any Courts Martial? ____________ Please Explain: ___________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Did he/she ever serve in the military police? ______________________________ RELIGION 22. RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE: _________________________________________ Name And Location Of Church, Temple, Synagogue Or Other Religious Organization with which you are affiliated, if any: _________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Have you studied for the ministry, priesthood, rabbinic order, or any other clergy position? __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 23. HOW OFTEN DO YOU ATTEND? __________________ Past or present church offices held: _________________________________________________ Other than attendance, what activities do you participate in at your church? _____ __________________________________________________________________ Have there been any recent changes in your religious activities? Yes __________ No _________ Please explain: _________________________________________ 24. WERE YOU RAISED IN A RELIGION DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE YOU NOW PRACTICE? _____ IF SO, PLEASE EXPLAIN: ____________________ _________________________________________________________________ 25. DOES YOUR SPOUSE PRACTICE A RELIGION DIFFERENT FROM YOURS? _____ IF SO, PLEASE EXPLAIN: ____________________________ 26. DOES YOUR SPOUSE PRACTICE A RELIGION DIFFERENT FROM YOURS? _____ IF SO, PLEASE EXPLAIN _____________________________ 26. DO YOU CURRENTLY, OR HAVE YOU IN THE PAST, SUPPORTED, OR ROUTINELY WATCHED OR LISTENED TO ANY RADIO OR TELEVISION MINISTRY? ________________________ IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE WHICH MINISTRY: _______________________________________________________ 27. DO YOU HAVE A PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OR FAVORITE SAYING THAT REFLECTS YOUR PERSONAL PHILOSPHY THAT CAN BE EXPRESSED IN A FEW SENTENCES OR LESS? Yes ____ No ____ If yes, please state it: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ POLITICAL 28. DO YOU HAVE A POLITICAL PREFERENCE? _________________________ Democrat ___________________ Republican ____________________ Independent _________________ Other ________________________ Does your spouse have a different preference? ______ If so, please explain: ____ _________________________________________________________________ 29. DO YOU IDENTIFY WITH OR SUPPORT A POLITICAL PARTY? IF SO, WHICH ONE? Democrat ___________________ Republication _________________ Independent _________________ Other ________________________ Is your spouse a member or supporter of a different party? __________________ If so, please explain: ________________________________________________ 30. DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF TO BE POLITICALLY CONSERVATIVE, MODERATE, OR LIBERAL? _______________________________ Does your spouse have a different political philosophy? ________________________ If so, please explain: _____________________________________________________ 31. HAVE YOU EVER SOUGHT OR HELD A POLITICAL OFFICE? __________ If yes, please give details: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 32. HAVE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE EVER WORKED IN A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN FOR A CANDIDATE OR FOR A POLITICAL GROUP, SEEKING CHANGE IN A LAW OR IN ENFORCEMENT OF A LAW? ______ If so, please describe: ________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ PHYSICAL/MEDICAL 33. DO YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY IN READING OR WRITING? _________ If so, please explain: ________________________________________________ 34. DO YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY IN SIGHT OR HEARING, OR DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER DISABILITY OR DISEASE THAT WOULD MAKE JURY SERVICE A HARDSHIP FOR YOU? _____ if so, please explain: ____________ __________________________________________________________________ 35. ARE YOU CURRENTLY TAKING ANY MEDICATION? _________________ If so, please give the name of the medication and the reason you take it: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 36. ARE YOU OR ANY OF THE MEMBERS OF YOUR FAMILY CURRENTLY BEING TREATED FOR A MEDICAL ILLNIESS WHICH WOULD PREVENT OR IMPAIR YOUR JURY SERVICE? _________________________________ If so, please explain: ________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 37. HAVE YOU, ANY FAMILY MEMBERS, OR ANY CLOSE FRIENDS EVER UNDERGONE COUNSELING, TREATMENT, OR HOSPITALIZATION FOR PSYCHIATRIC, EMOTIONAL, FAMILY, BEHAVIORAL, OR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS? _______________________________________________________ If so, please give details (including the name of the hospital and/or doctor/counselor seen): _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 38. DO YOU HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER, FRIEND, OR OTHER PERSON WITH WHOM YOU ARE ASSOCIATED WHO HAS BEEN DIAGNOSED AS MENTALLY RETARDED OR AS HAVING A LEARNING DISABILITY? ___ __________________________________________________________________ 39. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER WORKED IN A MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY OR HOSPITAL OF ANY KIND? If so, please describe: _________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 40. HAVE YOU EVER READ BOOKS OR ARTICLES DEALING WITH PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, MENTAL HEALTH OR MENTAL RETARDATION? If so, please describe: ________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 41. DO YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE PERSONALLY KNOW ANY PSYCHIATRISTS OR PSYCHOLOGISTS? If so, please name: _____________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 42. HAVE YOU EVER TAKEN ANY COURSES IN THE FIELDS OF PSYCHIATRY OR PSYCHOLOGY? If so, please describe: _________________ __________________________________________________________________ 43. DO YOU HAVE ANY PREJUDICE IN FAVOR OF, AGAINST, OR ANY FIXED OPINIONS CONCERNING PSYCHIATRIC OR PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTIMONY? ______________________ If so, please explain: ________________________________________________ CAPITAL PUNISHMENT/DEATH PENALTY 44. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORAL, RELIGIOUS, OR PERSONAL BELIEFS THAT WOULD PREVENT YOU FROM SITTING IN JUDGMENT OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING? YES ______ NO ______ 45. ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF THE DEATH PENALTY AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME? YES ______ NO ______ Please explain: ___________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 46. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE DEATH PENALTY SERVES ANY LEGITIMATE PURPOSE OR PURPOSES IN OUR SOCIETY? YES ________ NO ________ If so, what purpose or purposes do you believe that it serves? ____ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 47. WITH REFERENCE TO THE DEATH PENALTY, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING SIX STATEMENTS BEST REPRESENT YOUR BELIEFS: (circle one) a. “I believe that the death penalty is appropriate for all crimes involving murder.” b. “I believe that the death penalty is appropriate for some crimes involving murder and I could return a verdict which assessed the death penalty in a proper case.” c. “I believe that the death penalty is appropriate for some crimes involving murder, but I could never return a verdict which assessed the death penalty.” d. “Although I do not believe that the death penalty ever ought to be invoked, as long as the law provides for it, I could assess it, under the proper set of circumstances.” e. “I could never, regardless of the facts and circumstances, return a verdict which assessed the death penalty.” f. None of the above. 48. FOR WHAT CRIMES DO YOU THINK THE DEATH PENALTY SHOULD BE AVAILABLE? _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 49. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE DEATH PENALTY SHOULD BE USED MORE FREQUENTLY, LESS FREQUENTLY, ABOUT THE SAME AS IT HAS BEEN, OR NOT AT ALL, AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME? ________ _________________________________________________________________ 50. DO YOU KNOW WHETHER YOUR RELIGION OR YOUR SPOUSE’S RELIGION HAS AN OFFICIAL POSITION IN REGARD TO THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME? YES ____ NO _______ If yes, what position has it taken? _____________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Does this conflict with your own personal feelings regarding the death penalty? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 50a. DO YOU AND YOUR SPOUSE HAVE CONFLICTING BELIEFS REGARDING THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME? YES _____ NO _____ IF YES, HOW DO THEY CONFLICT? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 51. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE DEATH PENALTY IS NOW BEING, OR HAS IN THE PAST BEEN, APPLIED IN A RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY MANNER? YES ____ NO ____ PLEASE EXPLAIN: ____________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 52. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORAL, RELIGIOUS, OR PERSONAL BELIEFS THAT WOULD PREVENT YOU FROM RETURNING A VERDICT WHICH WOULD ULTIMATELY RESULT IN THE EXECUTION OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please explain: _______________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 52a. IF A SENTENCE OF LIFE WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE IS AN OPTION, COULD YOU NEVERTHELESS RECOMMEND A SENTENCE OF DEATH? YES ____ NO ____ Please explain: ____________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ PERSONAL 53. DO YOU OR THE MEMBERS OF YOUR IMMEDIATE FAMILY OWN A PET(S). If so, what kind? _____________________________________________ 54. WHAT KIND OF VEHICLE DO YOU DRIVE? __________________________ WHAT KIND OF VEHICLE DOES YOUR SPOUSE DRIVE? ______________ 55. TO WHICH CIVIC CLUBS, SOCIETIES, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS, OR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS DO YOU BELONG? PLEASE INDICATE OFFICES HELD, IF ANY: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 56. DO YOU CONTRIBUTE MONEY OR SERVICES TO ANY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION? If so, please describe: _______________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 57. ARE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE A MEMBER OF (OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A MEMBER OF) ANY NEIGHBORHOOD, LOCAL, STATE, OR NATIONWIDE CRIME PREVENTION WATCH ORGANIZATION? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please describe: _______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 58. WHAT ARE YOUR HOBBIES? ______________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 59. DO YOU SUBSCRIBE TO AND/OR REGULARLY READ A NEWSPAPER? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, which one(s): _______________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 60. WHAT ARE YOUR FAVORATE MOVIES? ____________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 61. WHAT ARE YOUR FAVORATE TELEVISION SHOWS, OR WHICH SHOWS DO YOU REGULARLY WATCH? ____________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 62. WHAT WAS THE LAST BOOK YOU READ? __________________________ 63. WHAT IS YOUR LEAST FAVORITE TYPE OF READING MATERIAL? ___ _________________________________________________________________ 64. HAVE YOU EVER READ A BOOK ABOUT A MURDER TRIAL? YES _____ NO _____ Which book or trial? ________________________________________ 65. WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE RADIO STATION? _______________________ 66. DO YOU SUBSCRIBE TO OR REGULARLY READ ANY MAGAZINES? YES ____ NO ____ If so, which one(s)? ________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 67. HAVE YOU EVER WRITTEN A LETTER TO THE EDITOR? YES _____ NO _____ If so, about what subject? ______________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 68. DO YOU OR HAVE YOU DISPLAYED A BUMPER STICKER ON YOUR CAR? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, what was the message: ___________________ __________________________________________________________________ 69. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN OPPOSED TO ANY GOVERNMENT ACTION? YES ____ NO ____ If so, did you express your opposition? YES ____ No _____ How? ____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 70. HAVE YOU EVER OWNED PERSONALIZED LICNESED PLATES? YES _____ NO _____ If yes, what was the message: ___________________________ 71. LIST FIVE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE PUBLICLY KNOWN WHOM YOU MOST RESPECT: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 72. HAVE YOU, A FAMILY MEMBER OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE WITH A PERSON OF ANOTHER RACE? YES _____ NO ____ If yes, please explain: ________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM/LAW ENFORCEMENT 73. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, ANY FAMILY MEMBER, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER BEEN ACCUSED, ARRESTED, INDICTED, CHARGED BY ANY MEANS, OR CONVICTED (including probation, deferred adjudication, conditional discharge, etc.) OF A CRIME OTHER THAN A TRAFFIC TICKET? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: ____________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 74. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, OR ANY FAMILY MEMBER EVER USED THE SERVICES OF AN ATTORNEY FOR ANY REASON? YES ____ NO _____ If yes, please give details and name of attorney: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ 75. DO YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, OR ANY FAMILY MEMBERS KNOW OR HAVE ANY FRIENDS WHO ARE ATTORNEYS? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give attorneys’ names and the types of practice they have: ___________________ __________________________________________________________________ 76. WHAT IS YOUR IMPRESSION OF PROSECUTORS IN GENERAL? _______ __________________________________________________________________ 77. WHAT IS YOUR IMPRESSION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN GENERAL? _______________________________________________________ 78. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING YOU BELIEVE WOULD BE THE GREATER WRONG: ___________ For a jury to find a guilty person “not guilty;” ___________ For a jury to find an innocent person “guilty.” 79. PLEASE RANK IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE TO YOU THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES FOR PUNISHMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE: __________ Punishment/retribution __________ Deterrence/prevention __________ Rehabilitation/reform 80. DO YOU KNOW ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN IN JAIL, OR WHO HAS BEEN TO PRISON, OR WHO IS IN PRISON? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 81. HAVE YOU OR ANY MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY EVER BEEN ASSOCIATED OR WORKED WITH ANY PROGRAM INVOLVED WITH THE PREVENTION OF CRIME, THE APPREHENSION OR PUNISHMENT OF OFFENDERS, OR THE REHABILITATION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF A CRIME? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: _______________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 82. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, ANY FAMILY MEMBER OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER BEEN THE VICTIM OF A CRIME, A WITNESS TO A CRIME, OR BEEN INTERESTED IN THE OUTCOME OF ANY CRIMINAL CASE (either personally or through the media)? YES _____ NO _____ If yes, please give details: ___________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 83. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO ANY OF THE FEDERAL, STATE, OR COUNTY COURTHOUSES BEFORE? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, for what reason: __________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 84. HAVE YOU EVER USED THE SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OR ANY OTHER PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE (for example: hot checks, child support)? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: __________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 85. HAVE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE EVER SERVED ON A GRAND JURY? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: _______________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 86. HAVE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE EVER BEEN A JUROR IN A CIVIL CASE? YES ____ NO ____ Who (i.e. you, your spouse, or both)? __________________ When? _______________ What type of case? _______________________ Were You/spouse the foreperson? Yes _____ No ____ What Court was it in? ________ ______________Did the jury assess damages? Yes ____ No ____ Is there anything about your/your spouse’s experience as a juror in that case which would affect your service in this case? Yes ____ No ____ If yes, please give details: ___ _________________________________________________________________ 87. HAVE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE EVER BEEN A JUROR IN A CRIMINAL CASE? YES ____ NO ____ Who (i.e. you, your spouse, or both)? ____________ _______________________ When? ____________________ What type of case? _______________________ Were you/spouse the foreperson? Yes ____ No ____ What Court was it in? _______________________________ Did the jury reach a verdict? Yes ____ No ____ What was your verdict? _______________________ Was the jury called upon to assess punishment? Yes ____ No ____ What was the punishment assessed: _____________ Is there anything about your/your spouse’s experience as a juror in that case which would affect your service in this case? Yes ____ No ____ If yes, please give details: _____________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 88. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE OR CLOSE FRIEND, PRESENTLY OR IN THE PAST, BEEN A MEMBER OR EMPLOYEE OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION? (Example: city, county, state or federal police officer; constable; deputy sheriff; ranger; Texas Department of Public Safety officer; auxiliary or reserve of any such organization or agency?) If so, please give name and describe: __________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 89. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER APPLIED FOR A JOB IN LAW ENFORCEMENT? If so, please describe: _______________________________________________________________ 90. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER BEEN CONNECTED WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ANY OTHER WAY? If so, please describe: _____________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ 91. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER STUDIED LAW? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: __________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ 92. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER HAD AN UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE INVOLVING LAW ENFORCEMENT? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please give details: _________ _______________________________________________________________ 93. HAVE YOU, YOUR SPOUSE, A RELATIVE, OR CLOSE FRIEND EVER WORKED AS A SECURITY GURAD OR FOR A SECURITY SERVICE? If so, please give details: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 94. DO YOU HAVE ANY STRONG PERSONAL FEELINGS ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN GENERAL, OR POLICE OFFICERS IN PARTICULAR? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please explain: _____________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 95. WHAT IS YOUR PERSONAL OPINION ABOUT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THE WAY IT WORKS? ______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 96. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE ANY CHANGES WHICH WE COULD MAKE IN OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH WOULD MAKE IT MORE EFFICIENT IN DEALING WITH THE PROBLEM OF CRIME? YES ____ NO ____ If so, what changes could be made? ___________ ________________________________________________________________ 97. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT TRIAL BY JURY IS THE BEST SYSTEM FOR THE TRIAL OF CRIMINAL CASES? YES ____ NO ____ What factors about the jury trial system make you feel this way? ____________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 98. DO YOU BELIEVE THE QUESTION OF PUNISHMENT, ONCE A PERSON HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF A CRIME, SHOULD BE DECIDED BY A JUDGE OR BY A JURY? __________________________________________________________________ 99. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE DEATH PENALTY SHOULD BE ASSESSED BY A JUDGE OR BY A JURY? ______________ Why do you believe this method is more appropriate? __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 100. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT A PERSON WHO IS CHARGED WITH COMMITTING A VIOLENT CRIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE RELEASED FROM CUSTODY ON A REASONABLE BAIL PENDING THE TRIAL OF THAT CASE? ____________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 101. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT MOST PEOPLE CHARGED WITH HAVING COMMITTED A CRIME ARE ACTUALLY GUILTY OF THAT CRIME? ____ __________________________________________________________________ 102. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT MOST EYEWITNESSES TO VIOLENT CRIMES ARE GENERALLY RELIABLE IN THEIR RECOLLECTIONS OF THE FACTS? __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 103. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN ACCUSED OF DOING SOMETHING THAT YOU DID NOT DO? If yes, please explain: ___________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 104. HAVE YOU EVER VISITED INSIDE A PRISON OR A JAIL? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, what was your impression? _________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 105. DO YOU BELIEVE OUR PENAL SYSTEM IS EVER SUCCESSFUL IN REHABILITATING/REFORMING PERSONS CONVICTED OF CRIME? YES ____ NO ____ Please explain your answer: ______________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 106. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT INNOCENT PEOPLE EVER ACTUALLY GET CONVICTED OF CRIMES? __________________________________________ 107. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE IS MORE, LESS, OR ABOUT THE SAME AMOUNT OF VIOLENT CRIME IN TARRANT COUNTY AS THERE WAS TEN YEARS AGO? ____________________________ If you believe there is more or less crime now, for what reason do you believe there has been a change? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ CASE SPECIFICS 108. DO YOU KNOW OR BELIEVE YOU KNOW, ANYTHING ABOUT THE FACTS OR PURPORTED FACTS OF THIS CASE, EITHER FROM THE NEWSPAPER, TV OR OTHER SOURCES? _____________________________ If so, what facts or purported facts and from what source: ___________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 109. DO YOU KNOW OR HAVE YOU HEARD OF EITHER OF THE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN THIS CASE, ___________ or ______________? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, how do you know them or what have you heard about them? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 110. DO YOU KNOW OR HAVE YOU HEARD OF ANY OF THE PROSECUTORS IN THIS CASE, ___________, __________, ________, ________________? YES _____ NO _____ If yes, how do you know them or what have you heard about them? ______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 111. DO YOU KNOW OR THINK YOU MIGHT KNOW THE DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE, ___________, OR ANY OF HIS FAMILY? YES _____ NO _____ If yes, in what capacity? _______________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 112. DID YOU KNOW [victim] DURING HER LIFETIME? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, in what capacity? ______________________________________________ 113. DO YOU KNOW ANY OF [victim’s] FAMILY MEMBERS? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, who and in what capacity? __________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 113a. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO OR RESIDED IN PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS AND/OR ELDORADO, ARKANSAS? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, why, when, and how long were you at each place? ___________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 114. DO YOU KNOW JUDGE ________ OR ANY OF THE COURT PERSONNEL? YES ____ NO ____ If so, please list their names and in what capacity you know them: _____________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 115. DO YOU KNOW _________, THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, OR ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF HIS STAFF? YES ____ NO ____ If so, please list their names and in what capacity you know them: _____________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 116. DO YOU KNOW ANY OF THE OTHER PROSPECTIVE JURORS IN THIS CASE? YES ____ NO ____ If so, please list their names and in what capacity you know them: ________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 117. DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE ANY PERSONAL PROBLEMS THAT WOULD PREVENT YOU FROM GIVING YOUR FULL ATTENTION TO THE TESTIMONY DURING THE TRIAL? YES ____ NO ____ If yes, please explain: ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 118. IF YOU HAVE ANY PLANS TO BE OUT OF THE FORT WORTH AREA DURING OCTOBER AND/OR EARLY NOVEMBER 1995, PLEASE INDICATE THE DATES AND THE REASON FOR YOUR ABSENCE: ______ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 119. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT BEING ASKED TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS JUROR INFORMATION SHEET? ______ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 120. HAVE YOU, FROM ANY SOURCE, FORMED AN OPINION IN THIS CASE? YES ____ NO ____ Please explain what opinion you have: __________________ __________________________________________________________________ 121. DO YOU WANT TO SERVE AS A JUROR IN THIS CASE? YES _____ NO _____ Please explain: _______________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 122. IS THERE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WHICH YOU FEEL THE JUDGE AND THE ATTORNEYS SHOULD KNOW IN REFERENCE TO YOUR ABILITY TO SERVE AS A JUROR IN THIS CASE THAT HAS NOT BEEN SET FORTH ABOVE? YES _____ NO _____ If yes, please explain: ____ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 123. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE MAY BE ANY REASON WHY IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE COMPLETELY FAIR AND IMPARTIAL IN THIS CASE? __________________ If so, what reason is there? _____________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 124. DO YOU KNOW OR HAVE YOU HEARD OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING POTENTIAL WITNESSES IN THIS CAUSE:

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas civil litigation lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

Collection of Judgments in Texas Small Claims Courts–Fort Worth, Texas Collections Attorneys

COLLECTION OF JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS LAWSUITS–SMALL CLAIMS AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE

 

If a party in a Texas lawsuit obtains a Judgment against the Defendant and the Defendant does not file a Motion for New Trial within five (5) days, does not file an Appeal within ten days, or does not pay the Judgment within ten (10) days you may seek other remedies to collect the Judgment. The Justice Court cannot assist a party in collection of that Judgment. Below are listed some remedies that are available to the parties:

 

ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT: A party may obtain an Abstract of Judgment any time after the 11th day from the date of Judgment. The cost of an original Abstract is Five Dollars, and the party may obtain them from the Small Claims or Justice Court. The Abstract may then be filed in the office of the County Clerk in any County where you think the Judgment Debtor may own real property. The Small Claim or Justice Court can also provide a short list of the surrounding County Clerk’s offices where a party can file the Abstract.

 

WRIT OF EXECUTION: A party may obtain a Writ of Execution any time after the 30th day from the date of Judgment. A Writ of Execution allows a Sheriff or Constable to try and seize certain non-exempt property from the Defendant. If property is seized, an auction will be held and the proceedings from the sale will satisfy your Judgment. The cost of a Writ of Execution varies from County to County, and the party may also want to contact the Constable or Sheriff in that County to discuss what items are considered non-exempt and may be subject to execution.

 

WRIT OF GARNISHMENT: A Writ of Garnishment is available 7 Days after the date of Judgment. This is a new lawsuit and is a complicated procedure. It is recommended that a Texas Civil Litigation Attorney be consulted.

 

TURNOVER WRIT: This process requires a formal court hearing. It is recommended that a Texas Civil Litigation Attorney be consulted.

 

HOW TO PAY TEXAS JUDGMENTS WHEN THE JUDGMENT HOLDER CANNOT BE FOUND

 

If a party to whom a judgment is owed cannot be located, it is possible to pay the judgment into the registry of the court on a showing of good faith attempts by the judgment debtor to locate the prevailing party. Once the court is satisfied that the party cannot be located, the payment can be accepted and the court can issue a release. The money is at that point held until claimed by the party to whom it is owed, or the money is forfeited to the State of Texas. It is again recommended that a Texas Civil Litigation Attorney be consulted.

 

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas collections lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]

 

Texas Civil Litigation–Pro Se Handbook–Northern District of Texas–U.S. District Court

PRO SE HANDBOOK
FOR CIVIL SUITS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of Texas
(Revised September 13, 2010)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Office of the Clerk
Karen Mitchell
Clerk of Court
TO PRO SE LITIGANTS:
It is my honor to serve the judges, attorneys, and members of the public who use our services.
This manual is intended to provide helpful information to pro se litigants on civil cases.
You are reminded that litigation in federal court is a complex process. You must follow the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. We strive to provide all
customers with accurate assistance on available forms and filing procedures, but the Clerk’s Office
cannot give legal advice regarding the prosecution or defense of any case.
Please see our website at www.txnd.uscourts.gov for additional information, including
instructions on electronic case filing. (Non-prisoner pro se litigants may participate unless
prohibited by the presiding judge.) You will also find answers to some of the most Frequently Asked
Questions.
We welcome your feedback on this manual and our services.
Karen Mitchell
Clerk, United States District Court
Northern District of Texas
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
A. Overview
B. Public Office Hours and Locations
C. Legal Holidays
2. Questions to Ask Before Filing a Lawsuit
A. Does the law recognize my injury?
B. Have I waited too long to sue?
C. Who are the right defendants?
D. What facts and evidence support my case?
E. Have I exhausted administrative remedies?
3. Jurisdiction – Should I File My Complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of
Texas?
4. Basics for Filing a Case in the Northern District of Texas
A. What are the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure?
B. What should I put in my Complaint?
C. Civil Case Filing Requirements
D. How much does it cost?
E. Service of Process
F. What is the Electronic Case Filing System (ECF)?
G. Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge
5. Motions – How Do I Ask the Judge to Do Things?
A. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1
B. Other Papers Required to Accompany a Motion
C. No Oral Argument or Instant Ruling on Motions
6. Serving Documents – Do I Have to Give the Defendant(s) Copies of Everything I File?
7. Discovery – How Do I Get Evidence to Help Me Prove My Case?
A. Depositions
B. Interrogatories
C. Requests for Production of Documents
D. Requests for Admission
E. Physical or Mental Examination
8. If I Can’t Find a Lawyer, But I Want One, What Should I Do?
9. Sanctions – What Are They?
10. If I Did Not Prevail, How Do I Appeal My Case?
A. General
B. Designation of Record
C. Questions About the Status of Your Appeal
11. If I Did Prevail, How Do I Enforce the Judgment?
A. Bill of Costs
B. Registration in Another District
C. Registration in the Northern District
D. Writ of Execution
E. Abstract of Judgment
12. List of Available Forms
A. Civil Complaint (General) and Civil Cover Sheet
B. Certificate of Interested Persons
C. Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees
D. Summons in a Civil Action
E. Motion to Appoint Counsel and Declaration in Support
F. Notice of Appeal
13. Glossary of Terms Used in Civil Litigation
1. Introduction
A. Overview
The Court has prepared this manual for you as someone who is interested in filing a lawsuit
or must appear in a lawsuit pro se, or without a lawyer. (“Pro se” is Latin phrase meaning “for
himself” or “for herself.”) It will help you understand the basics of the legal process but will not
teach you about the law. For that, you must do your own research. This manual is not a substitute
for having your own lawyer. You are urged to hire a lawyer, if possible.
Chapter 2 will help you decide whether you should file your lawsuit here. If you do, Chapters
3 through 10 will explain how to file it, and how it will proceed once you do. At the end, there is
a glossary of legal terms that may be unfamiliar to you.
Please visit our website at www.txnd.uscourts.gov for access to the Local Rules and Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, court forms, and Electronic Case Filing information. (When you register
for electronic filing, you may file documents from the convenience of your home, and you will
receive email notification when the opposing side files a document or the Court enters an order, as
soon as its entered on the docket.)
If, after reading this Handbook and reviewing the materials available on our website,
you still have questions about your case, you may wish to contact the Clerk’s Office. Please
understand that court employees may not give legal advice. This means they cannot interpret rules
or a judge’s order, calculate a deadline, give advice on how to proceed, or speculate on the outcome
of a matter.
B. Locations and Office Hours
`
The Clerk’s Office has seven divisional offices, which are open Monday through Friday,
except legal holidays. Their locations and public office hours are shown below:
Abilene – Division 1
341 Pine Street, Room 2008
Abilene, Texas 79601-5928
Phone (325) 677-6311
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Amarillo – Division 2
205 E. Fifth Street, Room 133
Amarillo, Texas 79101-1559
Phone (806) 468-3800
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Dallas – Division 3
1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452
Dallas, Texas 75242-1310
Phone (214) 753-2200
8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Fort Worth – Division 4
501 West 10th Street, Room 310
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 850-6600
8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Lubbock – Division 5
1205 Texas Avenue, Rom 209
Lubbock, Texas 79401-4091
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
San Angelo – Division 6
33 East Twohig Street, Room 202
San Angelo, Texas 76903-6451
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Wichita Falls – Division 7
1000 Lamar Street, Room 203
Wichita Falls, Texas 76301-3431
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., 1:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
If you mail a filing to the Court, address your envelope to the Hon. Karen Mitchell, Clerk of Court,
at the correct divisional office.
(Return to Table of Contents)
C. Legal Holidays
The District Clerk’s Office is closed on the following holidays:
• New Year’s Day
• Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Birthday
• George Washington’s Birthday (commonly referred to as President’s Day)
• Memorial Day
• Independence Day
• Labor Day
• Columbus Day
• Veterans Day
• Thanksgiving Day
• Christmas Day
If the Clerk’s Office is closed by the Court on any other day, or due to inclement weather,
closure information will be posted on the Court’s website at www.txnd.uscourts.gov.
(Return to Table of Contents)
2. Questions to Ask Before Filing a Lawsuit
Filing a lawsuit does not necessarily mean that you will get the result you want. There
are five important questions to ask before you file a lawsuit in federal court. There are other
questions you may also need to consider, depending on your case, but the list below is a good
place to start.
A. Does the law recognize my injury?
A lawsuit requires a legal injury that the law recognizes and for which it provides a
remedy. Many things that are “wrong” are not illegal. Which statute or court decision do
you think that the defendant has violated? After you have determined that you have a legal
claim, you must decide whether this court is the proper court to hear your lawsuit.
B. Have I waited too long to file a lawsuit?
The “statute of limitations” sets a time limit within which a lawsuit can properly be
filed. If the deadline has passed before you file suit, the Court may dismiss your case.
Whether your claim is barred by a statute of limitations is a question that may require legal
research on your part.
C. Who are the right defendants?
You may only sue defendants whom you believe are responsible for the wrong you
have suffered. When you write your complaint, include facts (such as specific dates, names,
and events) that support the relief you seek against each person you have sued. Listing a
name in the caption of the complaint is not enough. If the main part (or “body”) of the
complaint does not say what a person listed in the caption did wrong, that person could be
dismissed from your case.
D. What facts and evidence support my case?
The person who brings a claim in federal court, known as the “plaintiff,” has the
“burden of proof.” That means the plaintiff must establish that some injury under law
actually happened. You should not sue someone whom you will not be able to show violated
your rights. You need facts to support your claims, and evidence, such as medical or police
reports, a witness who saw what happened, or other proof is helpful.
E. Have I exhausted administrative remedies?
If you want to appeal the decision of a governmental agency, the law may require you
to complete all of the agency’s administrative procedures for appealing its rulings before you
file a lawsuit.
For example, the denial of an application for social security benefits can be appealed
to a federal court only after a final decision on the application is issued by the Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration. Similarly, a claim of employment discrimination must
be filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or its partner state
agencies before a claim may proceed in federal court. Time limits often apply, so you are
encouraged to visit an agency’s website to learn more information or access available forms.
For your convenience, the Social Security Administration’s website is www.ssa.gov, and the
EEOC’s website is www.eeoc.gov. You may be able to find other agencies’ websites easily
through the federal government’s information website www.info.gov or by calling (800)
FED-INFO (800.333.4636).
(Return to Table of Contents)
3. Jurisdiction – Should I file my complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Texas?
There are two different court systems in the United States: state courts and federal
courts. Before you file a case in federal court, first make sure it has jurisdiction over your
potential lawsuit, which means the power to hear and decide certain cases.
State courts may hear almost any type of case, including civil, domestic (divorce, child
custody, and child support), probate and property disputes. However, federal courts, such
as the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, may only hear certain types of
cases. For a federal court to have jurisdiction over your case, one of the following must
apply:
• Your claim is that a federal law or the U.S. Constitution has been violated
(“Federal Question” jurisdiction);
• You intend to sue the United States government (“U.S. Government
Defendant” jurisdiction); or
• You are a citizen of a different state than the defendant(s) and you claim to be
owed at least $75,000 (“Diversity” jurisdiction).
If you believe that a federal court will have jurisdiction over your case, you must file
your case in the right district. Each state has one or more federal district courts. Texas has
four – the Northern District, the Eastern District, the Western District, and the Southern
District.
Each district has one or more divisional offices that serve specific counties within the
district. The seven divisions in the Northern District of Texas serve the 100 counties below:
• Abilene Division – Callahan, Eastland, Fisher, Haskell, Howard, Jones,
Mitchell, Nolan, Shackelford, Stephens, Stonewall, Taylor, and Throckmorton;
• Amarillo Division – Armstrong, Brisco, Carson, Castro, Childress,
Collingsworth, Dallam, Deaf Smith, Donley, Gray, Hall, Hansford, Hartley,
Hemphill, Hutchinson, Lipscomb, Moore, Ochiltree, Oldham, Parmer, Potter,
Roberts, Randall, Roberts, Sherman, Swisher, and Wheeler;
• Dallas Division – Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Navarro, and
Rockwall;
• Fort Worth Division – Commanche, Erath, Hood, Jack, Palo Pinto, Parker,
Tarrant, and Wise;
• Lubbock Division – Bailey, Borden, Cochran, Crosby, Dawson, Dickens,
Floyd, Gaines, Garza, Hale, Hockley, Kent, Lamb, Lubbock, Lynn, Motley,
Scurry, Terry, and Yoakum;
• San Angelo Division – Brown, Coke, Coleman, Concho, Crockett, Glasscock,
Irion, Menard, Mills, Reagan, Runnels, Schleicher, Sterling, Sutton, and Tom
Green; and
• Wichita Falls Division – Archer, Baylor, Clay, Cottle, Crockett, Foard,
Hardeman, King, Knox, Montague, Wichita, Wilbarger, and Young.
Generally, your lawsuit should be filed in the division where the defendant resides or
where the facts giving rise to your lawsuit occurred.
(Return to Table of Contents)
4. Basics for Filing a Case in the Northern District of Texas
A. What are the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure?
Every plaintiff and defendant must follow the rules of the court in which the case is
filed. In the Northern District of Texas there are several sets of rules you must follow.
Some rules apply in every federal court in the country. They include the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure (FED. R. CIV. P.), which control everything from the filing of the
complaint to the jury’s verdict. Other national rules include the Federal Rules of Evidence,
which control what evidence may be used to decide the case; and the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, which control how you can appeal the judge’s decisions if you disagree
with them. Copies of these rules can be found on the United States’ Courts website at
http://www.uscourts.gov/RulesAndPolicies/FederalRulemaking/RulesAndForms.aspx. Due
to budget constraints, we are unable to provide copies of these rules.
In addition to the rules that apply in all federal courts, this Court also has Local Rules
that you must follow. The numbering system of the Local Rules corresponds with the
numbering system of the Federal Rules for easy reference. It is important to remember that,
as a pro se litigant, you are responsible for knowing and following the court’s Local
Rules and procedures. These rules are available on the court’s website at
http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/rules/localrules/lr_civil.html. We can provide you a copy upon
your request.
If your case needs to be filed in another court, contact the Clerk’s Office of that court
for information regarding local rules and procedures for filing your case.
B. What Should I Put in My Complaint?
A civil case in federal court starts when you file your Complaint. Rule 8(a) and Rule
10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FED. R. CIV. P.) require you to:
1. List the names, address, and telephone number of each plaintiff, and the name
and address of each defendant;
2. Say why you believe this court has the power to decide your case (i.e., that it
has jurisdiction over your lawsuit);
3. Explain why you believe that each defendant violated the law and is
responsible for your injuries;
4. Number each paragraph in your complaint and limit, as much as possible, each
paragraph to a single set of circumstances;
5. State what legal injuries you claim to have suffered and what persons are
responsible for each such legal injury;
6. Clearly state what you are asking the Court to do if you prevail; and
7. Sign it at the bottom. (Each plaintiff must sign. See “signature block”
instructions in Section C below.)
You are not required to use a particular form of complaint, but the Clerk’s Office has
a Complaint form that you may use. See section 12 of this manual.
If you wish to demand a jury trial, you may file it as a separate document or request
it in the Complaint. (Checking the “Jury Demand” box on the Civil Cover Sheet is not
sufficient to request a jury trial.) If you request it in the Complaint, the title of the Complaint
must also state “. . . And Jury Demand.” There is no fee to file a jury demand.
C. Civil Case Filing Requirements
You must sign all documents that you file with the Clerk (see FED. R. CIV. P. 11(a)).
Each document should include a “block” of information underneath your signature that
includes your typed or printed name, address, telephone number, and fax number (if
available). If you register for Electronic Case Filing (You may register as soon as you file
your complaint!), and electronically file future documents over the Internet, you must add
your email address to the bottom of this “signature block.” To sign a document that you will
electronically file, you may print, sign, and scan your document before filing, use an
electronic graphical signature, or represent your signature as “s/ Typed Name,” above the
“signature block” of information.
In addition to preparing your Complaint, the Local Rules require you to submit a:
• Civil Cover Sheet, which helps the Clerk enter statistical data correctly;
• a separately signed certificate of interested persons, which is a list of all legal
entities that are financially interested in the outcome of the case (The judge
needs this information to determine if he or she may preside over the case or
must ask the Clerk to assign another judge to avoid a conflict of interest.);
• a Summons in a Civil Case form for each named defendant (If the filing fee
was not paid, the Clerk cannot issue a summons until the judge grants you the
right to proceed in forma pauperis, or “without payment of fee,” and directs
the clerk to issue the summons.
These forms are available as attachments to printed copies of this manual.
When you deliver or mail your complaint to the Clerk (filing by fax is never permitted
absent judge approval), a deputy clerk will assign it a case number and a judge. If the
division has more than one district judge, the Clerk will use a computerized system to
randomly select the judge. If the district judge automatically seeks the help of a magistrate
judge, the Clerk must “refer” the case. If there is more than one magistrate judge in the
division, the Clerk will use the same the system to randomly select the magistrate judge. In
those divisions, the Clerk has been ordered to follow a random assignment method and
cannot “give” anyone a specific judge.
Please see the Court’s website at www.txnd.uscourts.gov under Filing/Filing
Procedures for more information on Civil Case procedures.
D. How Much Does It Cost?
The fee to file almost any non-prisoner civil action in federal court is $400.00. If you
believe you cannot afford to pay the filing fee, you may file an Application to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis and Declaration in Support (see Section 12). If the judge grants your
application, you will be allowed to proceed without prepayment of the fee. Copies of these
forms are included as attachments to the end of this manual.
E. Service of Process
To serve a defendant a copy of your Complaint, follow the procedures found under
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Generally, a copy of the Complaint is served under a Summons issued by the Clerk.
To issue the Summons, the Clerk must sign, date, and emboss or append the Court’s seal.
Rule 4(c)(2) provides for personal service by anyone 18 years of age or older, who is NOT
a party to the suit. Other common methods of service are described below:
• Service by the United States Marshal – If you are granted in forma pauperis
status, the judge may order the U.S. Marshal to complete service for you. You
will still be required to prepare the Summons form and the USM Form 285,
and provide necessary copies of your Complaint for service.
• Service by mail – Service may be made by mailing the Summons and a copy
of the Complaint to each defendant by registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested. See FED. R CIV. P. 4(e)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 106.
• Service through the Secretary of State – For service on companies formed
or registered in Texas through the Secretary of State, please refer to the Texas
Long Arm Statute. See section 17.041 of the TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE.
• Service on the United States – Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure governs service on the United States of America, the Attorney
General, and the agencies, officers, employees, and corporations of the United
States. The United States Attorney’s Office can be served personally or via
registered or certified mail addressed as follows:
Civil Process Clerk
U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas
Division Name
Address
City, State & Zip Code
See the Guide for Filing Federal Civil Suits Against the United States, an
Agency Official, or an Employee of the United States Government in the
Northern District of Texas on the court’s website at www.txnd.uscourts.gov
under Filing/Filing Procedures for more information on filing a civil suit
against the United States.
• Waiver of Service – Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure says
that a defendant has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the
summons. You must send the defendant a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for
Waiver of Service of Summons form, two copies of a Waiver of Service of
Summons form, a copy of the complaint, and a prepaid means for returning the
form. The defendant must be given a reasonable time of at least 30 days after
the request was sent – or at least 60 days if sent to the defendant outside any
judicial district of the United States, to return the executed Waiver of Service
of Summons form to you. Waiver of service is accomplished when the
defendant consents to the waiver and completes and returns a waiver form.
The defendant may decline to waive service using the same form.
F. What is the Electronic Case Filing System (ECF)?
Cases filed in the Northern District of Texas are maintained electronically through the
court’s Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system. The electronic version of the docket and
associated documents comprise the official record of the court. Remote access to the record
is granted through the court’s ECF system or the federal judiciary’s Public Access to Court
Electronic Records (PACER) system.
Under LR 5.1(e) and the court’s ECF Administrative Procedures, you must file a
Complaint on paper but must file any other pleading, motion, or other paper by electronic
means. These procedures include instructions on registration and electronic filing.
Additionally, you should refer to FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2 for the requirements to redact private
information.
When a document is docketed, you will receive email notification as soon as its
entered on the docket, and you will be able to access the document one time, free of charge.
Docket sheets and images of this and other federal courts’ documents are also
available for a small fee through the Judiciary’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records
(PACER) system. PACER registration is free, and most documents cost only $.10 per page
to download, with a maximum charge of $2.40 per document. (Court transcripts are higher.)
See the PACER website at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov to register or call the PACER
Service Center at (800) 676-6856.
G. Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge
A magistrate judge may, upon the consent of all parties in a civil action, conduct any
or all proceedings, including a jury or non-jury civil trial, and order entry of a final judgment
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. If all parties involved in a case consent, the presiding district
judge may enter an order of transfer, and reassign the case to a magistrate judge.
Your decision to consent, or not to consent, to the reassignment of the case to a
magistrate judge is entirely voluntary and without any adverse consequences if you choose
not to. Communicate your decision to the Clerk’s Office using the docket event entitled
Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge found in the ECF system.
(Return to Table of Contents)
5. Motions – How Do I Ask the Judge to Do Things?
A. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1
A motion is an application or request made to the judge. Be aware of the Local Rules
regarding motions practice (Local Rule 56.1 for summary judgment motions, and Local Rule
7.1 for other motions). All motions must comply with the Local Rules or the court may
“strike” or disregard them. Motions are used to seek various types of relief while a lawsuit
is pending, such as a motion to amend pleadings or a motion to compel discovery. A note
of caution: motions should only be filed when necessary; multiple or frivolous motions can
result in penalties by the court.
Responses to motions must be filed with the Clerk’s Office and served on the
opposing party within at least 21 days after the motion was filed, and a reply must be filed
and served within 14 days after the response was filed. Failure to file a response or reply
within the time prescribed may subject the motion to summary ruling. Motions for summary
judgment have different time frames for briefing. See Local Rule 56.1.
The court may modify any of the above schedules.
B. Other Papers Required to Accompany a Motion
In addition to the general requirements, other papers described below, may be required
to accompany your motion:
1. Brief or Memorandum of Law
A brief in support must be filed in support of certain motions. See LR 7.1, LCrR 47.1;
http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/rules/localrules/civilrules7.html#71. If the brief is included
in the motion, the document should be titled “Motion and Brief in Support.” Except by
permission of the presiding judge, or as provided in LR 56.5(b), your brief must not exceed
25 pages (excluding the table of contents and table of authorities). (The opposing side may
file a response with the same page limit. If you file a “reply,” it must not exceed ten pages,
and you must obtain the judge’s permission to file any other document than those addressed
in LR 7.1.)
Permission to file a brief in excess of this page limitation will be granted only for
extraordinary and compelling reasons. See LR 7.2(c) and LCrR 47(c). A brief filed in a
bankruptcy appeal must comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure unless
otherwise directed by the presiding judge.
A brief exceeding ten pages must contain a table of contents and a table of authorities.
The table of authorities must include an alphabetically arranged table of cases, statutes, and
other authorities cited, with page references to the location of all citations. See LR 7.2 (d)
and LCrR 47.2 (d).
The court may modify any of the above limitations.
2. Appendix
Documentary or non-documentary evidence used to support or oppose a motion must
be included in an appendix. See LR 7.1(i) for specific appendix format requirements. The
appendix must be assembled as a separate, self-contained document. Each page of the
appendix must measure 8 1/2 x 11 inches, and each page must be numbered legibly in the
lower, right-hand corner sequentially through the last page of the entire appendix. A
non-documentary or oversized exhibit must be placed in a 9 x 12 inch envelope that is
numbered as if it were a single page.
If a party’s motion or response is accompanied by an appendix, the party’s brief must
include citations to each page of the appendix that supports each assertion regarding the
documentary or non-documentary evidence used to support or oppose the motion. See LR
7.2(e).
3. Certificate of Conference
When you file some motions, you must contact the attorney for the defendant to
discuss your motion and state defendant’s position in a Certificate of Conference, usually
found at the end of a motion. See LR 7.1(a), LCrR 47.1(a).
4. Proposed Order Granting the Motion
Unopposed motions must be accompanied by an agreed proposed order, signed by the
attorneys or parties. In addition, an opposed motion submitted by electronic means must be
accompanied by a proposed order using the instructions found in the Proposed Order docket
event.
A proposed order must be submitted separately from the motion, and should have a
place for the judge to sign if the motion is granted. See LR 7.1(c).
C. No Oral Argument or Instant Ruling on Motions
Local Civil Rule 7.1(g) provides that, unless otherwise directed by the presiding
judge, oral argument on a motion will not be held. It is not uncommon for district and
magistrate judges to be in trial on other matters for the duration of the day. A file and a
motion for emergency relief may not reach the judge until a break for lunch or the end of the
day.
If your motion is not emergency in nature, it may be several days, or several weeks,
before a ruling is forthcoming, depending on the deadlines for the opposing side to respond,
the nature of the case, the judge’s trial schedule, and the judge’s docket load. Whether a
motion be emergency or not in nature, the judge will typically review the record and
pleadings on file and enter an order that will be provided to all parties of record.
There is no need to wait in the Clerk’s Office for a ruling on an emergency motion.
It is best to notify a supervisor that you have filed an emergency motion and place all of your
contact information (including your mobile phone number, if available) on your pleadings.
The supervisor will ensure that a deputy clerk contacts you immediately should the judge
need to see you or a ruling is issued in your case.
(Return to Table of Contents)
6. Serving Documents
Do I have to give the defendant(s) copies of everything I file?
Yes! Even if you are proceeding in forma pauperis, you must serve an identical copy
of each document you file on every attorney or party who has made an appearance in the
case. (See Rule 5 of the Fed. R. Civ. P.) It is also a good idea for you to keep a copy of each
document you file. Sample language you may use to complete the Certificate of Service at the end
of each document you serve:
• On (Date) I filed the foregoing document with the clerk of court for the U.S.
District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the ECF system. I hereby certify
that I have served all counsel and/or pro se parties of record electronically or by
another manner authorized by FED. R. CIV. P. 5 (b)(2).
/Signature/
• I hereby certify that on (Date) , I forwarded a copy of the foregoing document to
, the attorney for (Defendant) at the address of .
/Signature/
(Return to Table of Contents)
7. Discovery – How Do I Get Evidence to Help Me Prove My Case?
“Discovery” is the process by which parties exchange or acquire information about
the issues in their case before trial. There are five main types of discovery. Each main type
is discussed below:
A. Depositions: “Depositions” are question-and-answer sessions held before trial.
In them, one party to a lawsuit asks another person questions about the issues raised in the
lawsuit. Rules 30 and 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure explain the procedures for
taking a deposition. The person taking the deposition must pay the costs associated with it.
If the person who will answer the questions is not a party to the lawsuit, Rule 45 explains
how they can be made to appear for questioning.
B. Interrogatories: “Interrogatories” are written questions served on another
party to the lawsuit. These questions, unless subject to objections, must be answered under
oath. Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states the rules for serving
interrogatories.
C. Requests for Production of Documents: In a “request for production of
documents,” one person asks the other person to turn over documents about the issues in the
lawsuit. The person asking for the documents must describe them in enough detail that the
other person knows which documents are being requested. Rules 34(a) and (b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure explain how to request documents from the other side in
the lawsuit. If the person that you want documents from is not a party to the lawsuit, Rules
34(c) and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure explain how to request their documents.
D. Requests for Admission: In a “request for admission,” one side writes out
statements that it wants the other side to admit are true. Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure establishes the requirements for requests for admission.
E. Physical or Mental Examination: When the mental or physical condition of
a party is at issue in a lawsuit, Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the
Court to order that person to submit to a physical or mental examination. The examination
must be done by someone qualified, like a physician or psychiatrist. The party who requested
the examination must pay for it.
Pursuant to LR 26.2, requests for discovery and discovery responses should generally
not be filed with the court, however, discovery related documents may be filed if necessary
for the court to resolve a discovery dispute or a pretrial motion.
(Return to Table of Contents)
8. If I Can’t Find a Lawyer, But I Want One, What Should I Do?
Even with this handbook, representing yourself in Court may be very difficult. That
is why the Court encourages everyone to find a lawyer if possible.
There may be alternatives to representing yourself if you are without sufficient funds
to hire a lawyer to assist you. There are attorneys and organizations, such as legal aid
societies, that may be willing to represent you “pro bono,” that is, free of charge or based on
some other arrangement. Information about Legal Aid of NorthWest Texas may be found
on their website at http://www.lanwt.org/apply_howto.asp. Information about the Dallas
Vo lu n t e e r At to rn e y Pro g r am may be found on the ir webs ite a t
http://www.dallasbar.com/dvap/dvap_info.asp?InfoID=22. In addition, the State Bar of
Texas’ website provides information on how a person may be able to obtain a pro bono
attorney and provides links to pro bono providers. You may wish to visit the State Bar of
Texas’ website.
In a civil case, a party is not entitled by law to an attorney. A pro se litigant who has
been found to be indigent (typically by the granting of an in forma pauperis application) and
is unable to otherwise obtain counsel may ask by filing a written motion that the court request
a lawyer to represent him or her. You should be aware, however, that there are many more
litigants making that request than there are attorneys available to volunteer their services.
Whether a lawyer is ultimately requested to represent a litigant depends on a number of
factors.
Sometimes the judges may appoint an attorney for any number of different reasons or
purposes. The attorney may be recruited to represent you at trial, to prepare a motion or brief
for you, or to represent you at a settlement conference. What role such an attorney performs
in any particular case is entirely within the discretion of the court.
(Return to Table of Contents)
9. Sanctions – What Are They?
A sanction is a penalty or a punishment. Pro se litigants are subject to sanctions for
some of the same reasons as licensed attorneys. When a party to a lawsuit presents a
document to the court, Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that party
to verify the accuracy and reasonableness of that document. If a submission to the court is
false, improper, or frivolous, the party filing such a document may be liable for monetary or
other sanctions. Sanctions imposed could consist of a monetary penalty or an order to pay
the opponent’s attorney fees, which could be a substantial amount. The judge may also
restrict a person from filing any future lawsuit until and unless certain conditions have been
met.
(Return to Table of Contents)
10. How Do I Appeal My Case?
A. General
A party dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial in a U.S. District Court may file a
motion for new trial or a motion to alter or amend a judgment. The grounds a party must
have to prevail on and the time limits for filing such motions are found in FED. R. CIV. P. 59.
An appeal from a U.S. District Court shall be taken to the appropriate appellate court.
Most appeals from a decision of this court proceed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit in New Orleans. An appeal taken prior to entry of final judgment may be considered
prematurely filed.
To initiate an appeal, file a Notice of Appeal that identifies the court to which you are
appealing, and the order that your are appealing, with the Clerk of the District Court (this
office). FED. R. APP. P. 3(a) governs the time within which a notice of appeal must be filed.
The Clerk’s Office has the responsibility to notify the appeals court and all parties that a
notice of appeal has been filed. See the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Local
Rules and Internal Operating Procedures of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
We will accept a Notice of Appeal without prepayment of any required fee, but a fee
may later be ordered, or your appeal dismissed for failure to pay the required appellate filing
fee. If you pay the fee to this office by check, make it payable to “Clerk, U.S. District
Court.”)
If you file an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, you will be required to
complete the Transcript Order Form for Appeal, even if a trial or hearing was not held.
This Court’s staff does not have access to any appellate court’s computer system.
Questions about the status of your appeal before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals should
be directed to their staff in New Orleans, Louisiana at (504) 310-7700. You may visit their
website at www.ca5.uscourts.gov.
(Return to Table of Contents)
11. Enforcement of a Judgment
A. Bill of Costs
A bill of costs is “a certified, itemized statement of the amount of costs owed by one
litigant to another, prepared so that the prevailing party may recover the costs from the losing
party.” Black’s Law Dictionary 173 (8th ed. 2004). If you prevail, file the Bill of Costs form
no later than 14 days after the Clerk’s Office entered judgment on the docket. See LR 54.1
and ECF Administrative Procedures Manual for filing instructions. The Bill of Costs should
reflect the costs allowable, as shown on the form. The Clerk’s Office does not monitor fees
or costs incurred during a suit except the filing fees remitted to this Court.
Unless the Court specifies another date, the Clerk’s Office will tax the costs 14 days
after filing. If a Bill of Costs includes “other” costs, the Clerk will reduce those costs from
the amount to be taxed, unless a judge has authorized the costs by order. If a party objects
to a Bill of Costs, the Clerk’s Office will not tax costs until ordered to do so by the presiding
judge.
Please note that “taxing” consists only of stamping, signing, and sealing with the
Court seal a filed Bill of Costs and placing it in the case record. The Clerk’s Office is not
responsible for collecting or assisting in the collection of costs. The Clerk’s Office will mail
a conformed copy to the party awarded costs upon that party’s request.
B. Registration in Another District
To certify a judgment that has been entered in the Northern District of Texas for
registration in another district, a person must submit a written request to the District Clerk’s
Office for preparation of a Certification of Judgment for Registration in Another District.
The District Clerk’s Office charges a $9.00 fee for the certification, plus $0.50 per page for
a copy of the judgment.
The District Clerk’s Office will prepare the certificate and notify the requesting party
that it is ready to be mailed or available to be picked up. The requesting party is responsible
for ensuring that all requirements of the district of intended registration have been met.
C. Registration in the Northern District
To register a judgment entered in another federal court with the Northern District of
Texas, a person should obtain a Certification of Judgment for Registration in Another District
from the court that entered the original judgment, and then deliver the completed certification
to the Clerk’s Office along with a $39.00 filing fee. The Clerk’s Office will take the
judgment and open it as a miscellaneous case.
D. Writ of Execution
A writ of execution is “a court order directing a sheriff or other officer to enforce a
judgment, usually by seizing and selling the judgment debtor’s property.” Black’s Law
Dictionary 609 (8th ed. 2004). A party wishing to file a Writ of Execution must obtain the
appropriate form online or from the District Clerk’s Office. The party must submit the
original completed form and one copy to the District Clerk’s Office along with an original
and one copy of the USM Form 285 (which is also available from the Marshals Service). If
a USM Form 285 does not accompany the Writ of Execution, the District Clerk’s Office will
return the Writ to the requesting party. The District Clerk’s Office does not assess a fee for
filing a Writ of Execution. However, the Marshals Service does assess a fee for serving the
Writ. Please contact the Marshals Service at (214) 767-0837 for more information.
While the Writ of Execution form is available online, the form cannot be submitted
by electronic means, nor will the District Clerk’s Office issue the Writ of Execution
electronically at this time. The requesting party will be notified upon issuance of the Writ
of Execution. If the requesting party wants a confirmed copy of the Writ, the party must
submit a self-addressed, stamped envelope.
E. Abstract of Judgment
An abstract of judgment is “a copy or summary of a judgment that, when filed with
the appropriate public office creates a lien on the judgment debtor’s non-exempt property.”
Black’s Law Dictionary 10 (8th ed. 2004). If you are the prevailing party and you need an
Abstract issued, use the appropriate form obtained from the Clerk’s Office. You may submit
the form electronically using the Request for Clerk to Issue Document event. There is no fee
for issuance. The Clerk’s Office will mail as many conformed copies to you as you request.
(Return to Table of Contents)
12. List of Available Forms
The forms listed below are among those available from the District Clerk’s Office or
can be found online at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/forms/prose.html:
A. Civil Complaint (General) and Civil Cover Sheet
B. Certificate of Interested Persons
C. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
D. Summons in a Civil Case
E. Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Declaration in Support
F. Notice of Appeal
Copies are included as attachments to printed copies of this manual.
(Return to Table of Contents)
13. Glossary of Terms Used in Civil Litigation
A————————————————————————————————————–
Affidavit – A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it, before
a notary or officer having authority to administer oaths.
Affirmed – In the practice of the court of appeals, it means that the court of appeals has
upheld the judgment of the trial court in one or more respects.
Answer – The formal written statement by a defendant responding to a civil complaint and
setting forth the grounds for his or her defense.
Appeal – A request made after a trial by a party that has lost on one or more issues that a
higher court (appellate court) review the trial court’s decision to determine if it was correct.
To make such a request is “to appeal” or “to take an appeal.” One who appeals is called the
“appellant;” the other party is the “appellee.”
Appellate – About appeals; an appellate court has the power to review the judgment of a
lower court (trial court or tribunal). For example, the U.S. circuit courts of appeals review
the decisions of the U.S. district courts.
B————————————————————————————————————–
Bankruptcy – A legal process by which persons or businesses that cannot pay their debts can
seek the assistance of the court in getting a fresh start. Under the protection of the bankruptcy
court, debtors may discharge their debts, usually by paying a portion of each debt.
Bankruptcy judges preside over these proceedings.
Bench trial – Trial without a jury in which a judge decides which party prevails.
Brief – A written statement submitted by a party in a case that explains why the court should
decide the case, or particular issues in a case, in that party’s favor.
C————————————————————————————————————–
Chambers – A judge’s office, typically including work space for the judge’s law clerks and
administrative assistant.
Case law – The law as reflected in the written decisions of the courts.
Chief Judge – The judge who has primary responsibility for the administration of a court;
chief judges in the lower federal courts are determined by seniority, among other rules.
Clerk of the Court – An officer appointed by the judges of the court to assist in managing
the flow of cases through the court, maintain court records, handle financial matters, and
provide other administrative support to the court.
Common law – The legal system that originated in England and is now in use in the United
States that relies on the articulation of legal principles in a historical succession of judicial
decisions. Common law principles can be changed by legislation.
Complaint – A written statement filed by the plaintiff that initiates a civil case, stating the
wrongs allegedly committed by the defendant and requesting relief from the court.
Contract – An agreement between two or more persons that creates an obligation to do or
not to do a particular thing.
Counsel – Legal advice; a term also used to refer to the lawyers in a case.
Court – Government entity authorized to resolve legal disputes. Judges sometimes use
“court” to refer to themselves in the third person, as in “the court has read the briefs.”
Court reporter – A person who makes a word-for-word record of what is said in court,
generally by using a stenographic machine, shorthand or audio recording, and then produces
a transcript of the proceedings upon request.
D————————————————————————————————————–
Damages – Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate
the plaintiffs for their injuries.
Default judgment – A judgment rendered in favor of a party asserting a claim because of the
defendant’s failure to answer or appear to contest the claim.
Defendant – The person or organization against whom the plaintiff brings suit.
Deposition – An oral statement made before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths.
Such statements are often taken to examine potential witnesses, to obtain discovery, or to be
used later in trial. See discovery.
Discovery – The process by which lawyers learn about their opponent’s case in preparation
for trial. Typical tools of discovery include depositions, interrogatories, requests for
admissions, and requests for documents. All of these devices help the lawyer learn the
relevant facts and collect and examine any relevant documents or other materials.
Docket – A log maintained by the clerk containing the complete history of each case in the
form of brief chronological entries summarizing the court proceedings, filings or other
actions.
E————————————————————————————————————–
En banc – “In the bench” or “as a full bench.” Refers to court sessions with the entire
membership of a court participating rather than the usual number. U.S. circuit courts of
appeals usually sit in panels of three judges, but all the judges in the court may decide certain
matters together. They are then said to be sitting “en banc” (occasionally spelled “in banc”).
Equitable – Pertaining to civil suits in “equity” rather than in “law.” In English legal history,
the courts of “law” could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy.
See damages. A separate court of “equity” could order someone to do something or to cease
to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have
both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a
trial by jury is normally available in “law” cases but not in “equity” cases.
Evidence – Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the
fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case in favor of one side or the other.
F————————————————————————————————————–
Federal question jurisdiction – Jurisdiction given to federal courts in cases involving the
interpretation and application of the U.S. Constitution, acts of Congress, and treaties.
File – To place a paper in the official custody of the clerk of court to enter into the files or
records of a case.
G————————————————————————————————————–
Garnishment – A court order to collect money or property.
Guardian Ad Litem – A person, usually a parent, appointed by the court to represent a
child.
H————————————————————————————————————–
Habeas corpus – A writ (court order) that is usually used to bring a prisoner before the court
to determine the legality of his imprisonment. Someone imprisoned in state court proceedings
can file a petition in federal court for a “writ of habeas corpus,” seeking to have the federal
court review whether the state has violated his or her rights under the U.S. Constitution.
Federal prisoners can file habeas petitions as well. A writ of habeas corpus may also be used
to bring a person in custody before the court to give testimony or to be prosecuted.
Hearsay – Statements by a witness who did not see or hear the incident in question but heard
about it from someone else. Hearsay is usually not admissible as evidence in court.
I————————————————————————————————————–
Impeachment – The process of calling a witness’s testimony into doubt. For example, if the
attorney can show that the witness may have fabricated portions of his testimony, the witness
is said to be “impeached.”
In forma pauperis – “In the manner of a pauper.” Permission given by the court to a person
to file a case without prepayment of the required court fees because the person cannot pay
them.
Injunction – A court order prohibiting a defendant from performing a specific act, or
compelling a defendant to perform a specific act.
Interrogatories – Written questions sent by one party in a lawsuit to an opposing party as
part of pretrial discovery in civil cases. The party receiving the interrogatories is required to
answer them in writing under oath.
Issue – 1. The disputed point between parties in a lawsuit; 2. To send out officially, as in a
court issuing an order.
J————————————————————————————————————–
Judge – An official of the judicial branch with authority to decide lawsuits brought before
courts. Used generically, the term judge may also refer to all judicial officers, including
Supreme Court justices.
Judgment – The official decision of a court finally resolving the dispute between the parties
to the lawsuit.
Jurisdiction – 1. The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case; 2. The geographic
area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
Jury – The group of persons selected to hear the evidence in a trial and render a verdict on
matters of fact. See also grand jury.
Jury instructions – A judge’s directions to the jury before it begins deliberations regarding
the factual questions it must answer and the legal rules that it must apply.
Jurisprudence – The study of law and the structure of the legal system.
L————————————————————————————————————–
Lawsuit – A legal action started by a plaintiff against a defendant based on a complaint that
the defendant failed to perform a legal duty which resulted in harm to the plaintiff.
Litigation – A case, controversy, or lawsuit. Participants (plaintiffs and defendants) in
lawsuits are called litigants.
M————————————————————————————————————-
Magistrate Judge – A judicial officer of a district court who conducts many pretrial civil
matters to move a case forward, and decides civil cases with the consent of the parties.
Mistrial – An invalid trial, caused by fundamental error. When a mistrial is declared, the
trial must start again with the selection of a new jury.
Motion – A request by a litigant to a judge for a decision on an issue relating to the case.
O————————————————————————————————————–
Opinion – A judge’s written explanation of the decision of the court.
Oral argument – An opportunity for lawyers to summarize their position before the court
and also to answer the judges’ questions.
P————————————————————————————————————–
Panel – 1. In appellate cases, a group of judges (usually three) assigned to decide the case;
2. In the jury selection process, the group of potential jurors; 3. The list of attorneys who are
both available and qualified to serve as court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who
cannot afford their own counsel.
Party – One of the litigants. At the trial level, the parties are typically referred to as the
plaintiff and defendant. On appeal, they are known as the appellant and appellee, or, in some
cases involving administrative agencies, as the petitioner and respondent.
Petit jury (or trial jury) – A group of citizens who hear the evidence presented by both sides
at trial and determine the facts in dispute. Federal civil juries consist of at least six persons.
See also Jury.
Plaintiff – The person who files the complaint and who asserts claims identifying legal injury
to them in a civil lawsuit.
Pleadings – Written statements filed with the court which describe a party’s legal or factual
assertions about the case.
Precedent – A court decision in an earlier case with facts and legal issues similar to a dispute
currently before a court. Judges will generally “follow precedent”- meaning that they use the
principles established in earlier cases to decide new cases that have similar facts and raise
similar legal issues. A judge will disregard precedent if a party can show that the earlier case
was wrongly decided, or that it differed in some significant way from the current case.
Pretrial conference – A meeting of the judge and lawyers to plan the trial, to discuss which
matters should be presented to the jury, to review proposed evidence and witnesses, and to
set a trial schedule. Typically, the judge and the parties also discuss the possibility of
settlement of the case.
Procedure – The rules for conducting a lawsuit; there are local rules, rules of civil procedure,
criminal procedure, evidence, bankruptcy, and appellate procedure.
Pro per – A slang expression sometimes used to refer to a pro se litigant. It is a corruption
of the Latin phrase “in propria persona.”
Pro se – A Latin term meaning “on one’s own behalf”; in courts, it refers to persons who
present their own cases without lawyers.
R————————————————————————————————————–
Record – A written account of the proceedings in a case, including all pleadings, evidence,
and exhibits submitted in the course of the case.
Remand – The act of an appellate court sending a case to a lower court for further
proceedings.
Reverse – The act of an appellate court setting aside the decision of a trial court. A reversal
is often accompanied by a remand to the lower court for further proceedings.
S————————————————————————————————————–
Service of process – The delivery of writs or summonses to the appropriate party.
Settlement – Parties to a lawsuit resolve their dispute without having a trial. Settlements
often involve the payment of compensation by one party in at least partial satisfaction of the
other party’s claims, but usually do not include the admission of fault.
Statute – A law passed by a legislature.
Statute of limitations – A law that sets the deadline by which parties must file suit to
enforce their rights. For example, if a state has a five year statute of limitations for breaches
of contract, and John breached a contract with Susan on January 1, 1995, Susan must file her
lawsuit by January 1, 2000. If the deadline passes, the “statute of limitations has run” and
the party may be prohibited from bringing a lawsuit; i.e. the claim is “time-barred.”
Sometimes a party’s attempt to assert his or her rights will “toll” the statute of limitations,
giving the party additional time to file suit.
Subpoena – A command, issued under authority of a court or other authorized government
entity, to a witness to appear and give testimony.
Subpoena duces tecum – A command to a witness to appear and produce documents.
Summary judgment – A decision made on the basis of statements and evidence presented
for the record without a trial. It is used when it is not necessary to resolve any factual
disputes in the case as to all or some of the claims.
T————————————————————————————————————–
Temporary restraining order – Prohibits a person from taking an action that is likely to
cause irreparable harm. This differs from an injunction in that it may be granted immediately,
without notice to the opposing party, and without a hearing. It is intended to last only until
a hearing can be held. Sometimes referred to as a “T.R.O.”
Testimony – Evidence presented orally by witnesses during trials or before grand juries.
Toll – See Statute of Limitations.
Tort – A civil wrong or breach of a duty to another person. The “victim” of a tort may be
entitled to sue for the harm suffered. Victims of crimes may also sue in tort for the wrongs
done to them. Most tort cases are handled in state court, except when the tort occurs on
federal property (e.g., a military base), when the government is the defendant, or when there
is diversity of citizenship between the parties.
Transcript – A written, word-for-word record of what was said, either in a proceeding such
as a trial, or during some other formal conversation, such as a hearing or oral deposition.
Trustee – In a bankruptcy case, a person appointed to represent the interests of the
bankruptcy estate and the unsecured creditors. The trustee’s responsibilities may include
liquidating the property of the estate, making distributions to creditors, and bringing actions
against creditors or the debtor to recover property of the bankruptcy estate.
U————————————————————————————————————–
Uphold – The appellate court agrees with the lower court decision and allows it to stand. See
Affirmed.
U.S. Attorney – A lawyer appointed by the President in each judicial district to prosecute and
defend cases for the federal government. The U.S. Attorney employs a staff of Assistant
U.S. Attorneys who appear as the government’s attorneys in individual cases.
V————————————————————————————————————–
Venue – The geographical location in which a case is tried.
Verdict – The decision of a trial jury or a judge that determines the guilt or innocence of a
criminal defendant, or that determines the final outcome of a civil case.
Voir dire – The process by which judges and lawyers select a trial jury from among those
eligible to serve, by questioning them to make certain that they would fairly decide the case.
“Voir dire” is a phrase meaning “to speak the truth.”
W————————————————————————————————————-
Witness – A person called upon by either side in a lawsuit to give testimony before the court
or jury.
Writ – A formal written command or order, issued by the court, requiring the performance
of a specific act.
Writ of certiorari – An order issued by the U.S. Supreme Court directing the lower court to
transmit records for a case which it will hear on appeal.

Williams, McClure & Parmelee is dedicated to high quality legal representation of businesses and insurance companies in a variety of matters. We are experienced Fort Worth, Texas civil litigation lawyers in Tarrant County who know Texas courts and Texas law. For more information, please contact the law firm at 817-335-8800. The firm’s office location is 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 300, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

Martindale AVtexas[2]